Teams

Roosters 55+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2022-08-09vs ColumbiaHoCo 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJim Firestone / Michael Hansberry vs Eric Putman / Viral Sheth2-6
2022-08-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephen Murray / Michael Hansberry vs Thomas Price / Dean Buck3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-31vs Thompson 7.0 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Phil Gelso vs Thomas Price / Murty Challa2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-25vs ColumbiaHoCo 55+Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Murray / Michael Hansberry vs Michael Punsalan / Majed Hamawy6-2, 6-4
2022-07-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Michael Hansberry vs John Marshall Hand / Jack Healey3-6, 2-6
2022-07-11vs Goodfellas 7.0 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Michael Hansberry vs James Forbes / Jeffrey Soriano6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-10vs Thompson 7.0 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Phil Gelso vs Vin Grabill / James Turnage4-6, 2-6
2022-07-06vs ColumbiaHoCo 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesPhil Gelso / Donald Reuwer vs Rodney Rector / Eric Putman7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJim Firestone / Michael Hansberry vs T Ashley Smoot / Richard Briggs6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2022-06-26vs Goodfellas 7.0 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Phil Gelso vs John Deleonibus / George Sybert5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJim Firestone / Michael Hansberry vs Alexandre Fines / Armando Zamora3-6, 1-6
2022-06-15vs ColumbiaHoCo 55+Won 10
W#3 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Michael Hansberry vs Richard McKeon / Michael Punsalan6-3, 7-6
2022-06-01vs Goodfellas 7.0 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDonald Reuwer / Phil Gelso vs James Forbes / John Deleonibus3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Gerald Jones
published 3.5
3.17
Michael Hansberry
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.16
Stephen Murray
published
3.13
Donald Reuwer
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
2.71
Chris Wertman
published 3
Jim Firestone
published
Randall Scott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donald Reuwer + Michael Hansberry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gerald Jones
2W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Michael Hansberry
109W–157L career · 13 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Stephen Murray
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Donald Reuwer
60W–121L career · 18 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Chris Wertman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Jim Firestone
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Randall Scott
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.