Teams

HCC-Hardesty Mangin

2024 Richmond Mixed 18 & Over · Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-30vs ACAC-Wilson's Sloppy JoesWon 10
W#3 DoublesJose Mendoza / Stephanie Yablonski vs Thomas Wilson / Jean Davis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-24vs Westwood-Warfield Love HurtsLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Jon Nystrom vs Kennon Harrison / Elizabeth Keith7-6, 1-6
2024-02-17vs Raintree-GromlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Jose Mendoza vs Amber Manry / Jay Harter7-5, 5-5
2024-02-10vs Westwood-Seredni Tennis The MenaceLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelby Morgan / Stephanie Yablonski vs Peyton Bowman / Kristy Seredni1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Kelby Morgan
published
3.49
Beth Stinson
published 3.5
3.46
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Scott Frazier
published
3.35
Jon Nystrom
published
3.33
Lisa Frazier
published
3.26
Virginia Berents
published
3.26
Benjamin Andrews
published 3.5
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
3.07
Sharon Mugford
published
3.01
Kirsten Knull
published
Krysten Bishop
published
Mark Westman
published
Susan Mangin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Frazier + Scott Frazier4549% games−3.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Quirk
7W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelby Morgan
10W–15L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Beth Stinson
27W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–85L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Scott Frazier
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jon Nystrom
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Lisa Frazier
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Virginia Berents
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Benjamin Andrews
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Sharon Mugford
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kirsten Knull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mark Westman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.