Teams

West Shore Trapp

2025 USTA 55 & Over League · 6.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.06 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Michele Reber / Asha Makam2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-19vs LTYC - LongoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNancy Pica / Paula Lowry vs Jeanne Sikora / Jessica May3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Crespo / Natalie Salter vs Cheri Work / Lucile Longo6-3, 6-2
2025-07-17vs Hempfield LOVE ALLWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Tomo Carson / Linda Barosh6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon McTavish / Sharon Weaver vs Michelle Curtis / Karen Loke5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Rabold / Melody Brough vs Martha Furness / Debra Myers6-2, 6-3
2025-07-10vs Hempfield - Fireballs (Bernhard)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Lore Rigano / Beth Alderman1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNatalie Salter / Tracey Wood vs Lisa Bernhard / Deborah Broskey6-3, 6-2
2025-07-03vs LTYC - LongoWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Pica / Paula Lowry vs Jessica May / Jeanne Sikora6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Asha Makam / Michele Reber2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Rabold / Melody Brough vs Janine Phillips / Elizabeth Richwine7-5, 6-2
2025-06-22vs Hershey - TITANIUM (McHugh)Won 21
L#1 DoublesTracey Wood / Nancy Pica vs Beverly Azemar / Lucinda McHugh2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNatalie Salter / Sharon Weaver vs Dori Pitzner / Gayle Goepfert6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Crespo / Dorcas Reindollar vs Marilou Cockroft / Terri Emler6-2, 6-2
2025-05-21vs Hempfield - Fireballs (Bernhard)Split 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Beth Alderman / Lore Rigano6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Crespo / Tracey Wood vs Deborah Broskey / Karen Vogel6-4, 6-3
2025-05-18vs Hershey - Golden Gals (Trapp)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPaula Lowry / Nancy Pica vs Sandra Holte / Kathryn Trapp6-2, 6-3
2025-05-08vs RCW Lavender LadiesWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Pica / Paula Lowry vs Elaine Rostolsky / Margaret Weik7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNatalie Salter / Tracey Wood vs Gerri Arment / Susan Rebert6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Anna Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Diane Rabold
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Nancy Pica
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 3
2.95
Susan Ruch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Paula Lowry
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
Sandra Crespo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Dorcas Reindollar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Lynn Graf
published
2.63
Natalie Salter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.23
Melody Brough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Janice Trapp
published
Paige Swarts
published
Sharon McTavish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Suzie Thoma
published
Tracey Wood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Graf + Dorcas Reindollar101056% games+7.2% vs expected
Nancy Pica + Paula Lowry973759% games+0.9% vs expected
Diane Rabold + Melody Brough5556% games−5.7% vs expected
Anna Jacobs + Susan Ruch1443% games−8.7% vs expected
Sharon McTavish + Sharon Weaver11552% gamesnot enough data
Anna Jacobs + Janice Trapp8458% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Graf + Paula Lowry4547% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Weaver + Paige Swarts5250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Jacobs
106W–100L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Diane Rabold
84W–93L career · 7 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Nancy Pica
210W–127L career · type A · 13 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Susan Ruch
78W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Paula Lowry
238W–139L career · type A · 12 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Sandra Crespo
213W–264L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Dorcas Reindollar
72W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
Lynn Graf
48W–79L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.76
3
Natalie Salter
17W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Melody Brough
51W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
Janice Trapp
23W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paige Swarts
15W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon McTavish
35W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Weaver
44W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzie Thoma
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Wood
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.