Teams

SunPro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W PM

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-02Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Amanda Moore6-0, 6-1
2026-05-26Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Celest Andrade4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Christensen / Michelle McGill vs Michelle Maxfield / Lauren Murphy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-19Split 11
W#1 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Seidi Bennett7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichelle McGill / Andrea Smith vs Rachel Hatch / Haley H Moreno1-6, 3-6
2026-05-12vs Eccles-TieffWon 10
W#1 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Sandra Stahle5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-04-28vs TorresWon 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Sarah Barnett6-2, 6-0
2026-04-11Won 10
W#2 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Britany Egan6-0, 6-3
2026-04-07vs Eccles-TieffLost 01
L#2 SinglesLauren Rawlings vs Lindsay Knight3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Summer Clawson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.80
Taylor Kirk
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.78
Lisa Mayberry
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.78
Athelia Graham
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 4
3.74
Kim Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Michelle Ainge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.69
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Jill Ford
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Andrea Smith
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Lauren Rawlings
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.62
Michelle McGill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 4
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.53
Shelli Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
Karen Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Smith + Karen Christensen4261% games+16.9% vs expected
Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford6159% games+13.5% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler8356% games+10.2% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Andrea Smith3360% games+9.4% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Lisa Mayberry3360% games+8.0% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.0% vs expected
Andrea Smith + Shelli Johnston11753% games+4.8% vs expected
Halli Craft + Kim Santiago4158% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Summer Clawson
38W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Belinda Jensen
150W–92L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.87
Taylor Kirk
80W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Lisa Mayberry
80W–81L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Athelia Graham
58W–16L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Kim Santiago
151W–88L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Tiffany Olson
115W–51L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Michelle Ainge
54W–38L career · 10 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
136W–64L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Jill Ford
86W–60L career · 8 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Andrea Smith
77W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
Lauren Rawlings
44W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
Michelle McGill
56W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.62
4
Kimberlie Bayne
95W–123L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 5 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Brenda Fowler
87W–76L career · 7 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Halli Craft
62W–48L career · 4 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
3.40
Karen Christensen
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.