Teams

CC - LLWx - Avila Moss 7.0W

2025 USTA CC Spring Adult 55 & OVER · CC USTA 55 & Over 7.0W

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-20vs CC - LLWx2 - Monarch Thompson 7.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Hightower / Deborah Cherry vs Teresa Schmutte / Christine Sweeney3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLori Bickel / Ann Brewer vs Gail Edry / Karen Meertens1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKelley Munson / Bonnie Lynam vs Beverley Dunn / Hilda Fischer6-2, 6-2
2025-07-18vs CC Avila Mulry 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanet Holland / Deborah Cherry vs Jessie Mulry / Cherie Charbonneau6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBonnie Lynam / Kelley Munson vs Elisabeth Grossman / Sharon Cole6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCoAnn Weil / Barbara Nicholson vs Jeanette Gruidl / Marty Nitzberg7-6, 6-1
2025-06-29vs CC Avila Mulry 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesJamie Hardisty / Helen Hightower vs Melbra King / Elisabeth Grossman6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Bickel / Janet Holland vs Jessie Mulry / Cherie Charbonneau7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesColleen Moss / Kelley Munson vs Sharon Cole / Jeanette Gruidl6-0, 6-1
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cherry / Helen Hightower vs Christine Sweeney / Teresa Schmutte6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLori Bickel / Deborah VANDENBERG vs Melanie Sundstrom / Stacie Reeve6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnn Brewer / Marie Murphy vs Hilda Fischer / Beverley Dunn2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cherry / Janet Holland vs Olivia Bolanos / Ramona Cabiles5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Brewer / Kelley Munson vs Beverley Dunn / Christine Sweeney6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesColleen Moss / Marie Murphy vs Jennifer Watson / Patti Wilson7-5, 6-3
2025-06-01vs CC Avila Mulry 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarie Murphy / Deborah VANDENBERG vs Diana Salcedo / Cherie Charbonneau6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnn Brewer / Kelley Munson vs Elisabeth Grossman / Kathleen York6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColleen Moss / CoAnn Weil vs Jessie Mulry / Marty Nitzberg6-3, 6-2
2025-05-16vs CC Avila Mulry 7.0WWon 30
W#1 DoublesHelen Hightower / Deborah Cherry vs Erin Sjoholm / Kathleen York6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Brewer / Ann Brewer vs Jessie Mulry / Melbra King7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJamie Hardisty / Barbara Nicholson vs Jeanette Gruidl / Diana Salcedo6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKelley Munson / Janet Holland vs Melanie Sundstrom / Linda Valentine6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Bickel / Deborah VANDENBERG vs Lori Deornellas / Teresa Schmutte6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBarbara Nicholson / CoAnn Weil vs Kathleen Aldridge / Jennifer Watson6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 55 & Over 7.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Lisa Corrente
published
3.28
Deborah VANDENBERG
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ann Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Marie Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Janet Holland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Lori Bickel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Deborah Cherry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Colleen Moss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Bonnie Lynam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Elizabeth Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
CoAnn Weil
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Helen Hightower
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jamie Hardisty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kelley Munson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Hightower + Deborah Cherry2350% games+2.1% vs expected
Deborah Cherry + Janet Holland4354% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bickel + Deborah VANDENBERG314 matchesnot enough data
Deborah VANDENBERG + Colleen Moss224 matchesnot enough data
Lori Bickel + Janet Holland123 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Munson + Colleen Moss303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Corrente
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Deborah VANDENBERG
24W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ann Brewer
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marie Murphy
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Janet Holland
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Lori Bickel
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Deborah Cherry
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Colleen Moss
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Bonnie Lynam
18W–8L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Elizabeth Brewer
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
CoAnn Weil
23W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Helen Hightower
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Hardisty
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelley Munson
23W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.