Teams

Long/Chattanooga

2024 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0 women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-07vs Young/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesDiane Hardin / Eileen Long vs Kari Martin / Marilyn Wright6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarole Miller / Janet Lawrence vs Michelle Larson / Terri Brunvoll1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSue Munson / Paula Reagan vs Beth Bourgeois / DeAnn Rauth7-6, 7-6
2024-04-06vs Young/ChattanoogaSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEileen Long / Diane Hardin vs DeAnn Rauth / Beth Bourgeois5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Lawrence / Paula Reagan vs Theresa Jones / Sharon Benson6-1, 6-2
2024-03-23vs Young/ChattanoogaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPaula Reagan / Bernadette Dorris vs Terri Brunvoll / Kari Martin6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanet Lawrence / Diane Hardin vs Jana Watters / Theresa Jones6-2, 6-2
2024-03-17vs Young/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiane Hardin / Janet Lawrence vs Terri Brunvoll / Michelle Larson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEileen Long / Ann Carroll vs Michele Sutton / Kellie Pioch6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Miller / Sue Munson vs DeAnn Rauth / Jana Watters3-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs Young/ChattanoogaWon 21
L#1 DoublesDiane Hardin / Janet Lawrence vs Michelle Larson / Terri Brunvoll2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesEileen Long / Mary Miller vs Michele Sutton / Sharon Benson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBernadette Dorris / Carole Miller vs DeAnn Rauth / Jana Watters2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Long/Chattanooga328716132
2Young/Chattanooga237818142

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Eileen Long
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Janet Lawrence
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.84
Bernadette Dorris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Diane Hardin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Carole Miller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Paula Reagan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
Sue Munson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernadette Dorris + Paula Reagan134 matchesnot enough data
Janet Lawrence + Diane Hardin123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Lawrence + Eileen Long303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Eileen Long
14W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
Janet Lawrence
22W–25L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Bernadette Dorris
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Diane Hardin
16W–20L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Carole Miller
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Reagan
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
Sue Munson
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.