Teams

HEDS

2022 Charlottesville Combo · 7.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-15vs BHSCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStacy Moren / Debra Lafond vs Wendy Merritt / Mary Voelmle5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTory Stribling / Noel Jorgensen vs Maya Mathew / Sue Frazier3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Jupin / Kelly Bauman vs Lynette Meynig / Lesley Hock1-6, 2-6
2022-09-08vs ACACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlison Henry / Pamela Jupin vs Kristin Carter / Beth Hollen5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTory Stribling / Noel Jorgensen vs Tammy Hertel / Susan Bayliss6-3, 6-3
2022-09-01vs ACACLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Henry / Pamela Jupin vs Corinne Haywood / Lindsay Bazydlo4-6, 1-6
2022-08-18vs BHSCLost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Moren / Tamar Glaser vs Allison Evanow / Marcy MacGovern6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-11vs ACACLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Moren / Debra Lafond vs Tammy Hertel / Beverly Sweeney4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Henry / Pamela Jupin vs Kristin Carter / Susan Bayliss4-6, 2-6
2022-08-04vs BHSCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStacy Moren / Tamar Glaser vs Lynette Meynig / Allison Evanow7-5
L#3 DoublesNoel Jorgensen / Ellen Hayes vs Marcy MacGovern / Sue Frazier4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Stacy Moren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.70
Tory Stribling
published
3.26
Noel Jorgensen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Allison Ewing
published 3.5
2.92
Pamela Jupin
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Moren + Noel Jorgensen5259% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Jupin + Noel Jorgensen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stacy Moren
166W–100L career · 9 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Tory Stribling
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Noel Jorgensen
149W–85L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Allison Ewing
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Pamela Jupin
120W–142L career · type A · 9 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.