Teams

CTL18/Meyers/CTFC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5

18 players · average NTRP 4.44 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-23vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCorey Garrity / Katie Meyers vs Jenkins Mann / Rachel Herzog6-6
L#2 DoublesChris Graham / Marlene Robinson vs Chris Stier / Addison Flowers5-4
2026-06-16vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBoone Walker / Kacey Rugg vs Jenkins Mann / Rachel Herzog4-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Collins / Shannon Powers vs Cale Johnson / Kaylin Hopkins4-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Echols / Ginger Lee vs Chris Stier / Lindsay Carney1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-09vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesElliot Turner / Katie Meyers vs Sean Junis / Katherine Mathis6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCorey Garrity / Jessica Gore vs Ryan Auger / Teri Grote5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBoone Walker / Marlene Robinson vs Cale Johnson / Addison Flowers6-3, 6-4
2026-06-02vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBoone Walker / Laura Plyler vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDavid Collins / Marlene Robinson vs Andrew Wescott / Sally Nguyen2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlex Echols / Ginger Lee vs Drew Casper / Lindsay Carney0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-19vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Collins / Ginger Lee vs Sean Junis / Sally Nguyen4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCorey Garrity / Kacey Rugg vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElliot Turner / Brennan Ferguson vs Charles Webb / Addison Flowers6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-14vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChris Graham / Kristin Estes vs Sean Junis / Sally Nguyen5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlex Echols / Shannon Powers vs Andrew Wescott / Carlynn Musil7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElliot Turner / Marlene Robinson vs Charles Webb / Rachel Herzog5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-05vs CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)Won 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Plyler / Corey Garrity vs Andrew Wescott / Teri Grote6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Meyers / David Collins vs Kaylin Hopkins / Drew Casper6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKacey Rugg / Kyle Edwards vs Josey Iliff / Gabrielle DuBruille5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Mixed 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL (A) 4.5M 18 & Over (Webb)5213821180
2CTL18/Meyers/CTFC2581330217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Jeannette Hammers
published
4.37
Corey Garrity
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Laura Plyler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Brennan Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.25
Kacey Rugg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
David Collins
published 4.5
4.22
Boone Walker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.19
Kristin Estes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Marlene Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Joseph Roche Sr
published
4.15
Kyle Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Jessica Gore
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Alex Echols
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.03
Katie Meyers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.96
Ginger Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.96
Shannon Powers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Elliot Turner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Chris Graham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Boone Walker + Jessica Gore224 matchesnot enough data
Alex Echols + Shannon Powers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannette Hammers
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Corey Garrity
4W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
4.37
Laura Plyler
48W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Brennan Ferguson
13W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
Kacey Rugg
37W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
David Collins
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Boone Walker
60W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.22
Kristin Estes
26W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
4.19
Marlene Robinson
22W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%<1%
4.16
Joseph Roche Sr
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Kyle Edwards
22W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
4.15
Jessica Gore
62W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Alex Echols
11W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
4.04
Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
4.03
4.5
Ginger Lee
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
Shannon Powers
38W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Elliot Turner
93W–37L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4.5
Chris Graham
1W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.