Teams

Reichling/Heimerman 55+ Swillers

2025 Adult 55 & Over Winter · 8.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-03vs Henneman 55+ Winter 2025Won 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Reichling / Robert Heimerman vs Scott Luhman / David Fishbaine3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCurt Hedin / Dave Malek vs Edwin Freeman / Kenneth Gutzman7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAndrei Sivanich / Ash Keswani vs Jeff Fontaine / Leif Johnson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Robert Heimerman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Andrei Sivanich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.89
Curt Hedin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
David Senior
published 4
3.81
Charles Carroll
published 4
3.78
John Reichling
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Dave Malek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Ash Keswani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Howard Siegel
published 4
3.71
David Goodman
published 4
3.61
Bill Sommers
published 4
Jerome Hartmann
published
Joel Haggerty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Heimerman + Dave Malek6169% games+11.6% vs expected
Robert Heimerman + John Reichling8652% games−0.3% vs expected
David Goodman + Andrei Sivanich6555% games−1.5% vs expected
David Goodman + Charles Carroll3350% games−6.4% vs expected
Robert Heimerman + Andrei Sivanich4165% gamesnot enough data
Curt Hedin + Andrei Sivanich213 matchesnot enough data
John Reichling + Andrei Sivanich303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Heimerman
52W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Andrei Sivanich
27W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Curt Hedin
36W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
4
David Senior
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Charles Carroll
20W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
John Reichling
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Dave Malek
20W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Ash Keswani
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Howard Siegel
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Goodman
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Bill Sommers
12W–18L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Jerome Hartmann
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joel Haggerty
8W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.