Teams

Three Chopt Young's RAC

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-19vs Avalon Ghita MenLost 01
L#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Thomas Young vs Vikram Nagulan / Laurent Beausergent5-7, 4-6
2022-10-05vs SCC StembridgeWon 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Young / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Dan Phipps / David Dwyer6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-28vs Belmont ArcaroWon 10
W#2 DoublesBhargavaram Kallam / Thomas Young vs Nicholas Arcaro / Mark Witthoefft6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTimothy Masten / Bhargavaram Kallam vs Toussaint Manley / Ryan Bardaro0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Bhargavaram Kallam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.61
Tim Parks
published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
3.18
Don Ha
published 3.5
2.89
Julius Anongos
published
2.87
Pete van Valkenburg
published
2.67
Don Bruce
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julius Anongos + Pete van Valkenburg3257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bhargavaram Kallam
146W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Parks
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Don Ha
15W–27L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Julius Anongos
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
Pete van Valkenburg
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Don Bruce
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.