Teams

ACAC Singh

2021 Richmond Adult 65 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 65 & Over Men 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-05vs Battery Park ThorntonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Hoppy Shores vs Michael Anderson / James Dugger6-1, 7-6
2021-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Burke / Jerry Cole vs Dan Sims / Coke Henderson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Cole / Randolph Moore vs James Johnson / Alexander Howlett7-5, 6-4
2021-06-07vs Williamsburg NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesReginald Kruszewski / Jerry Cole vs Richard Nelson / Steve Corkran6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2021-05-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesThomas Burke / Jerry Cole vs Alexander Howlett / James Johnson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-05-10vs Williamsburg NelsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJerry Cole / Steven Larue vs Richard Nelson / John Streker6-1, 6-4
2021-04-26Won 10
W#2 DoublesDon Caffery / Jerry Cole vs James Johnson / Alexander Howlett6-1, 6-0
2021-04-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesJerry Cole / Anant Singh vs Steve Corkran / Coke Henderson6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 65 & Over Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Jerry Cole
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Craik Goodspeed
published 4
3.42
Anant Singh
published 3.5
3.23
Randolph Moore
published
Marshall Forbes
published
Scott McFadden
published
Steve Shannon
published
Steven Larue
published
Thomas Burke
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marshall Forbes + Anant Singh6452% gamesnot enough data
Anant Singh + Steve Shannon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Cole
165W–65L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Craik Goodspeed
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Anant Singh
33W–31L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
Randolph Moore
22W–26L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Marshall Forbes
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Scott McFadden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steve Shannon
5W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Steven Larue
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Thomas Burke
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.