Teams

Fowler Park (Brandy Hoffmeister)*

USTA Atlanta Fall - Mixed 18 & Over · 3.5 Mixed

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Wild Timber (Ken Kunchick)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesElisia van Scoter / Michael van Scoter vs Eddie Sobh / Maribel Shields5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Shiva / Michelle Helms vs Adam Kirkley / Wilhelmine Casimir-Summers2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSteve McDowell / Elissa Denham vs Heath Morton / Ashley Hooie7-6, 6-2
2025-10-17vs Kingsley Estates (Kara O'Neill)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gantt / Michael van Scoter vs Erin Myers / Ethan Lovell6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesChelsea McLaughlin / Travis McLaughlin vs Kara O'Neill / James Harris1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBrandy Hoffmeister / Steve McDowell vs Aldan O'Neill / Colleen Weingarten6-2, 6-1
2025-10-10vs Fowler Park (Hugh Pham)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBrandy Hoffmeister / Fernando Salinas vs Jessica Franks / Viet Nguyen3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElissa Denham / Scott Denham vs K Huy Chau / Maggie Wu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve McDowell / Joann Schuster vs Oscar Gualdron / Hieu Cao4-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs Concord Farms (Cheri Akselsen)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGirish Shiva / Brandy Hoffmeister vs Tom Akselsen / Stephanie Dibert2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTravis McLaughlin / Michelle Helms vs Charles Davenport / Jennifer Dimenna4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesScott Denham / Elisia van Scoter vs Mike Schick / Brittany Schick6-1, 6-1
2025-09-26vs Westbrook (Todd Densmore)*Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFernando Salinas / Elisia van Scoter vs Marcus Kingsley / Laurie Lanzo3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGirish Shiva / Joann Schuster vs Todd Densmore / Jenna Hand2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrandy Hoffmeister / Scott Denham vs Jane Russell / Manas Dasgupta6-4, 6-2
2025-09-19vs Fieldstone (Jennie Laliberte)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Gantt / Girish Shiva vs Michelle Hicks / Dendell Lawrence6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesScott Denham / Brandy Hoffmeister vs Scott Heck / Jennie Laliberte6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAbram Hoffmeister / Elissa Denham vs Matt Olson / Aimee Olson0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · 3.5 Mixed
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Rachel Willis
published
3.51
Mary Beth English
published
3.35
Elisia van Scoter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Michael van Scoter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Abram Hoffmeister
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Joann Schuster
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Elissa Denham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Michelle Helms
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Brandy Hoffmeister
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Fernando Salinas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Amanda Gantt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Robert Gatelein
published
Chelsea McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Girish Shiva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Callahan
published
Misti Abbett
published
Scott Denham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Steve McDowell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Travis McLaughlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael van Scoter + Elisia van Scoter4450% gamesnot enough data
Elissa Denham + Scott Denham2342% gamesnot enough data
Brandy Hoffmeister + Girish Shiva123 matchesnot enough data
Brandy Hoffmeister + Scott Denham213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Willis
30W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.54
Mary Beth English
21W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.51
Elisia van Scoter
44W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Michael van Scoter
15W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Abram Hoffmeister
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Joann Schuster
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
3.15
Elissa Denham
12W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.15
Michelle Helms
21W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Brandy Hoffmeister
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Fernando Salinas
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Amanda Gantt
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Robert Gatelein
3W–15L career · no lines in 2026
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Chelsea McLaughlin
2W–2L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Girish Shiva
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Callahan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Misti Abbett
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Scott Denham
5W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Steve McDowell
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis McLaughlin
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.