Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Brick

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-27vs SDNC 7.0 Rancho Santa Fe TC/ BastiasSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDorthe Smith / Bill Sudlow vs Juliana Guillory / Greg Wormmeester7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs Holly Carter / Jeff Kelleher4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-20vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ TailacLost 01
L#2 DoublesJurgita Chachisvilis / Mirianas Chachisvilis vs Mike Sartwell / Tomoko Hoffman2-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJurgita Chachisvilis / Mirianas Chachisvilis vs Robert Picunko / Nancy Picunko6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesBill Sudlow / Cynthia Noet vs Andre Freund / Angela Verdenacci4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJurgita Chachisvilis / Mirianas Chachisvilis vs Robert Picunko / Nancy Picunko0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs Murray Reicher / Ann Ortel6-3, 6-2
2022-07-02vs SDNC 7.0 TC of Vista/ LeungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRebekah Seidel / Bill Sudlow vs Michael Harlan / Susan Shaw6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaeve Brick / John Brick vs Dale Greene / Patricia Newman0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJurgita Chachisvilis / Mirianas Chachisvilis vs Mary Frances Morilak / Mark Lindsey6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Maeve Brick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Bruce Danielson
published 3.5
3.20
Michelle Atkinson
published
3.20
Bill Sudlow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Rebekah Seidel
published
3.02
Jurgita Chachisvilis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
John Brick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Atkinson + Bruce Danielson11259% games+15.5% vs expected
Mirianas Chachisvilis + Maeve Brick4261% gamesnot enough data
Bill Sudlow + Maeve Brick224 matchesnot enough data
John Brick + Maeve Brick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Maeve Brick
124W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bruce Danielson
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Michelle Atkinson
17W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Bill Sudlow
53W–108L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Rebekah Seidel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Jurgita Chachisvilis
33W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
John Brick
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mirianas Chachisvilis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.