Teams

DAC/Moore-Carothers W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

24 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-08vs T bar M/Dodgen-LaRosen W4.0Won 30
W#1 SinglesAndrea Fuquay vs Kathryn LeRosen6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLindsey Starnes / Whitney Ragsdale vs Yasmine Meza / Lyn Pustmueller7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Carothers vs Ambur Finley6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Amanda VanDenBerg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.75
Dana Browne
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Whitney Ragsdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Ashley Carothers
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.56
Andrea Fuquay
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.52
Kerrie Stephanian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Jennifer Willson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.41
Heather Evetts
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.38
Nicole Ashton
published
3.35
Amy Wandstrat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Stephanie Hilliard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Lindsey Starnes
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.29
Katherine Rader
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Amy Timmerman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Laura Frazure
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Amy Shepardson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jessie Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Meredith Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.17
Jenny Littlefield
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.16
Ashlea Bennett
published 3.5
Jenni Purser
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Leah Goodhart
published
Maggie Carlisle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerrie Stephanian + Lindsey Starnes6258% games+1.3% vs expected
Kerrie Stephanian + Dana Browne314 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Williams + Jennifer Willson303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Frazure + Jenny Littlefield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda VanDenBerg
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dana Browne
16W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Whitney Ragsdale
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Ashley Carothers
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Andrea Fuquay
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
Kerrie Stephanian
19W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Jennifer Willson
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Heather Evetts
20W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
Nicole Ashton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Amy Wandstrat
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
Stephanie Hilliard
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Lindsey Starnes
38W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Katherine Rader
21W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Amy Timmerman
6W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Lauren Lopez
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Laura Frazure
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amy Shepardson
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessie Williams
15W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Meredith Gibbs
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jenny Littlefield
14W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Ashlea Bennett
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Jenni Purser
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leah Goodhart
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maggie Carlisle
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.