Teams

Waide/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-09vs Gustin/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlyssa Maddox / Kim Huinker vs Savannah Johnson / Annette Thompson3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeg Stratton vs Emma Poindexter0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeAnn Waide / Jamie Iverson vs Misty Gouge / Jackie Hone7-6, 6-1
2024-10-26vs Bagwell/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeg Stratton / Kim Huinker vs Hannah Frame / Martha Filipkowski2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLeAnn Waide vs Emily Stiner6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Iverson / Elizabeth Waide vs Joy Bray / Ashley Webb2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Rebecca Bender
published
2.23
LeAnn Waide
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.18
Kim Huinker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Jamie Iverson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Meg Stratton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
1.90
Alyssa Maddox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Waide
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Stratton + Kim Huinker2346% games+4.2% vs expected
LeAnn Waide + Jamie Iverson2445% games−2.2% vs expected
LeAnn Waide + Kim Huinker2541% games−4.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Waide + Jamie Iverson224 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Iverson + Meg Stratton044 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Iverson + Alyssa Maddox134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Huinker + Alyssa Maddox134 matchesnot enough data
Meg Stratton + Alyssa Maddox033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Bender
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
LeAnn Waide
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Kim Huinker
6W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jamie Iverson
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Meg Stratton
3W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Alyssa Maddox
3W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Elizabeth Waide
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.