Teams

300 Wimsett

2025 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-12-17vs WS TomasiSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJulie Redding / Lauren Weseman vs Carla Intal / Crystal Dix6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Kristine van Vorst vs Jennifer Bogle / Isabel Zadezensky6-2, 6-3
2025-11-23vs Alachua/GerlingWon 10
W#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Kirsty Freshwater vs Della Tuten / Mary Butterworth6-4, 6-3
2025-11-16vs HCC LernerLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Paradise Black / Julie Redding vs Ann Redfern / Katie Hambrook6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2025-11-15vs WS TomasiLost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Chalouhi / Julie Redding vs Carla Intal / Ivana Simic4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Kristine van Vorst vs Rebecca Long / Xue Li3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLori Knackstedt / Iryna Zasimovich vs Emilee Cato / Stephanie Portillo6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-11-09vs WS TomasiWon 21
W#1 DoublesAshley Chalouhi / Danielle Jake-schoffman vs Carla Intal / Isabel Zadezensky6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKristine van Vorst / MARY K WIMSETT vs Rebecca Long / Natasha Seavers6-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesIryna Zasimovich / Lori Knackstedt vs Corinne Tomasi / Ivana Simic6-3, 6-2
2025-11-08vs HCC LernerWon 10
W#3 DoublesIryna Zasimovich / Lori Knackstedt vs Elizabeth Laconi / Bailey Lerner6-2, 6-2
2025-11-02vs Alachua/GerlingLost 12
W#1 DoublesKirsty Freshwater / Sarah Hooghuis vs Jazmyn Broxton / Jennifer Gerling6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJhanna Gilbert / Julie Redding vs Jennifer Brunsting / Mary Butterworth1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Ashley Fieldman vs Margaret Fita / Della Tuten5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-10-28vs HCC LernerWon 30
W#1 DoublesAshley Fieldman / Ashley Chalouhi vs Cara Duffaut / Sheena Jones6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Hooghuis / Danielle Jake-schoffman vs Kelly Nash / Chiara de Gennaro6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMARY K WIMSETT / Megan Jansen vs Stephanie Tangeman / Rachel Brock6-4, 7-6
2025-10-10vs Alachua/GerlingLost 12
L#1 DoublesJhanna Gilbert / Megan Jansen vs Kelly Cordell / Margaret Fita4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Jake-schoffman / Heather Mears vs Jennifer Gerling / Alison Safir5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSara Murphy / Kirsty Freshwater vs Laura Isaacs / Kristin O'Connor7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Sarah Hooghuis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
3.10
Ashley Chalouhi
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3
3.08
Iryna Zasimovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.06
Jhanna Gilbert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Heather Mears
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Kirsty Freshwater
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Sara Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
2.82
Danielle Jake-schoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Megan Jansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
MARY K WIMSETT
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.64
Kristine van Vorst
published
2.63
Lori Knackstedt
published
2.51
Julie Redding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.25
Marly Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARY K WIMSETT + Sarah Hooghuis3253% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Paradise Black + Jhanna Gilbert404 matchesnot enough data
Kristine van Vorst + Megan Jansen213 matchesnot enough data
Heather Mears + Jhanna Gilbert213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Hooghuis
53W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Nicole Paradise Black
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3
Ashley Chalouhi
30W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Iryna Zasimovich
51W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Jhanna Gilbert
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Heather Mears
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.04
Kirsty Freshwater
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sara Murphy
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Cameron Rosenthal
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Danielle Jake-schoffman
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Megan Jansen
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
2.77
3
MARY K WIMSETT
82W–74L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Kristine van Vorst
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%17%83%
2.64
Lori Knackstedt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
2.5
Julie Redding
40W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%46%54%
2.51
Marly Wilson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.