Teams

CTL18/CLEARY/RK

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 6.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Erin Groves
published 3.5
3.26
Tim Kvam
published
Chaston McNeely
published 3.5
3.22
Ruth Horger
published
3.20
Ellen Rodillo
published 3.5
2.93
Melissa Hayden
published
2.89
Lauren Lamey
published
2.85
Kristin Plyler
published
2.78
Wayne Taylor
published
Curry Best
published 3
2.73
Scott Lambe
published
2.62
Carol Heebner
published 3
2.59
Thad Cleary
published
Alan Lott
published
Hank Gaddis
published
Jim Lamey
published
MacKenzie Cleary
published
Steven Powell
published
Wendy Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Lamey + Jim Lamey2438% gamesnot enough data
Ruth Horger + Tim Kvam3258% gamesnot enough data
Wayne Taylor + Wendy Taylor033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Groves
74W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.48
Tim Kvam
82W–94L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Chaston McNeely
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ruth Horger
104W–66L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Ellen Rodillo
93W–70L career · type A · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
Melissa Hayden
68W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.93
Lauren Lamey
64W–76L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.89
Kristin Plyler
81W–52L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Wayne Taylor
24W–42L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Curry Best
23W–19L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Lambe
32W–59L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Carol Heebner
55W–72L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.62
Thad Cleary
38W–32L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Alan Lott
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Hank Gaddis
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jim Lamey
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MacKenzie Cleary
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Powell
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Taylor
1W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.