Teams

A18 4.0W TP Speller

2025 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Summer

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-15vs A18 4.0W PM MozingoWon 31
W#1 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Hannah Lindesmith vs Laura Ferguson / Shannon Taylor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMelody Proakis vs Julianna Mozingo0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesErin Gray / Erin Baginski vs Kathy Stitzlein / Taylor Leohr6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBrooke Kaylor vs Ashley Wallace6-1, 6-1
2025-07-01vs A18 4.0W SP2 MillerLost 14
W#1 DoublesNatalie Soto / Jamie Fox vs Amy Hissong / Alison Snook6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCora Shane vs Emily Hissong7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesShelby Schaffner / Erin Gray vs Laurel Marsillo / Amanda Nierzwicki2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMelody Proakis vs Susan Miller7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesErin Baginski / Patricia Gorenc vs Kari Knoll / Donna Reynolds6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-24vs A18 4.0W NC1 HoustonLost 23
W#1 DoublesErin Gray / Shelby Schaffner vs Valerie Johnson / Stephanie Kurtz6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelody Proakis vs Christina Terzola2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHannah Lindesmith / Amanda Petit vs Stephanie Bailey / Torie Utterback6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrooke Kaylor vs Sarah Robbins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Baginski / Zoe Nicholas vs Sara Timken / Dee Kelleher6-2, 6-0
2025-06-10vs A18 4.0W PM MozingoWon 50
W#1 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Natalie Soto vs Laura Ferguson / Cynthia Rhyner6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCora Shane vs Julianna Mozingo6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHannah Lindesmith / Erin Gray vs Claudia Miles / Taylor Leohr6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBrooke Kaylor vs Ashley Wallace6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJamie Fox / Patricia Gorenc vs Marcela Nicolae / Kathy Stitzlein6-0, 6-4
2025-05-27vs A18 4.0W SP2 MillerLost 14
L#1 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Shelby Schaffner vs Kathy Green / Alison Snook2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCora Shane vs Emily Hissong4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Fox / Natalie Soto vs Laurel Marsillo / Donna Reynolds7-5, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMelody Proakis vs Megan Nuske4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesErin Baginski / Erin Gray vs Cristina Atienza / Amy Hissong3-6, 3-6
2025-05-20vs A18 4.0W NC1 HoustonWon 50
W#1 DoublesShelby Schaffner / Jamie Fox vs Sarah Robbins / Kayla Shaheen7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCora Shane vs Kim Broadwater6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKristianne Bontempo / Amanda Petit vs Torie Utterback / Stephanie Bailey6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBrooke Kaylor vs Stephanie Houston6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesErin Gray / Patricia Gorenc vs Dee Kelleher / Stephanie Kurtz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Women Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Cora Shane
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Natalie Soto
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Shelby Schaffner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Kristianne Bontempo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Erin Baginski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Hannah Lindesmith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Brooke Kaylor
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Amanda Petit
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
Erin Gray
published
Jamie Fox
published
Melody Proakis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Patricia Gorenc
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zoe Nicholas
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jamie Fox + Natalie Soto7169% games+12.3% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Kristianne Bontempo3553% games+8.2% vs expected
Erin Baginski + Erin Gray10754% games+7.5% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Erin Gray3252% games+6.9% vs expected
Natalie Soto + Kristianne Bontempo8066% games+4.5% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Jamie Fox6452% games+2.4% vs expected
Jamie Fox + Kristianne Bontempo8654% games+1.9% vs expected
Shelby Schaffner + Erin Baginski111351% games−0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cora Shane
78W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.94
Natalie Soto
29W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.86
Shelby Schaffner
73W–114L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Kristianne Bontempo
57W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Erin Baginski
91W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Hannah Lindesmith
24W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Brooke Kaylor
58W–62L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Amanda Petit
120W–70L career · 9 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Erin Gray
79W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jamie Fox
54W–53L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Melody Proakis
67W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Gorenc
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zoe Nicholas
13W–5L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.