Teams

Allis/Piedmont 18 3.5W Singles Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesAnita Allis vs Suki Gutierrez6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesGwen Peridot vs Rosemarie Palazzolo6-0, 6-4
2025-07-08vs Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PMSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Kamron Moody5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnita Allis vs Stephanie Adams6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Misty Hilliard6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnita Allis vs Aphton Lang6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Rosemarie Palazzolo6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDanielle Laliberte vs Suki Gutierrez6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAnita Allis vs Pam Fabros-Beuchat7-6, 7-6
2025-06-17vs Adams 18 3.5W Singles Tues PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Stacey Russo6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnita Allis vs Kathryn Fleihan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDanielle Laliberte vs Kristina Zemaityte5-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesAnita Allis vs Misty Hilliard6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Aphton Lang7-6, 6-1
2025-05-20vs Augustine 18+ 3.5W Singles Tues PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesGwen Peridot vs Kate Augustine1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAnna McGinnis vs Caroline Walker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDanielle Laliberte vs Frannie Benfield6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Singles Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Anna McGinnis
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Anita Allis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Danielle Laliberte
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
Gwen Peridot
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna McGinnis
9W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Anita Allis
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
24%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Danielle Laliberte
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Gwen Peridot
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.