Teams

Jeon - ReString

2026 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 10 9:00 PM
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
Sep 16 9:00 PM
Montgomery TennisPlex
Sep 23 9:00 PM
vs
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
Sep 24 9:00 PM
vs
Wheaton Indoor Tennis Center
2026-08-26vs Hamdani - Smooth StrokesWon 10
W#1 SinglesTucker Howard vs Ali Hamdani6-4, 6-2
2026-08-18vs CJ Rock 4.0 (Du)Won 30
W#1 SinglesTucker Howard vs Jian Liu4-6, 6-3
W#2 SinglesHyunjae Jeon vs Lei Fu6-3, 4-6
W#3 SinglesPeter Zhu vs John Zhong6-3, 6-1
2026-08-10vs ChenWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Hanlun Song4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTucker Howard vs Chungfu Yang6-2, 7-5
2026-08-02Won 10
W#3 SinglesTucker Howard vs Christopher Lee6-4, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMatthew Bent vs Alexander Gerson3-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesTucker Howard vs David Kim6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Montgomery Singles 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jeon - ReString3110211101
2Hamdani - Smooth Strokes12271386
3CJ Rock 4.0 (Du)0421018129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Tucker Howard
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.75
Hyunjae Jeon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Matthew Bent
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.60
Ivan Kozliak
published 4
3.53
Peter Zhu
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tucker Howard
172W–96L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Hyunjae Jeon
58W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Matthew Bent
58W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–286L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.60
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.