Teams

6-AFaulkner-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening

9 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-14vs 3-RGoff-EnoLost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Tyler Carroll1-6, 1-6
2022-04-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Juan Rojas6-1, 6-1
2022-04-11vs 7-CMansfield-EnoLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlan Faulkner / Graham Schillmoller vs Dipen Vyas / Ethan Holston6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Zack Czajkowski3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesW Troutman vs Rohan Vilms6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-04-10vs 8-DBaddour-CHCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesW Troutman / Lawrence Brock vs David Baddour / Paul Hodulik5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Martchek vs Chris Hanes6-3, 6-2
2022-04-01vs 1-AOliver-ENOWon 20
W#1 DoublesGraham Schillmoller / Lawrence Brock vs Gabriel Iocco / Pedro Loaiza6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Brooks / Daniel Martchek vs Chris Fuhrer / Pete Vammino1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-28vs 2-JByrd-EnoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Forrest / W Troutman vs Joshua Collins / Henry Kennelly7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Martchek / William Caldwell vs Blake Hutchinson / Michael Roach2-6, 2-6
2022-03-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesW Troutman / Daniel Martchek vs Chris Stewart / Rick Larson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.20
Raymond Xu
published
4.15
Daniel Martchek
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.91
Lawrence Brock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
W Troutman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Graham Schillmoller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Justin Fejfar
published
3.79
Daniel Hill
published 4
3.75
William Caldwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lawrence Brock + Graham Schillmoller472159% games+2.3% vs expected
W Troutman + Lawrence Brock22659% games+0.4% vs expected
W Troutman + Graham Schillmoller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
Raymond Xu
30W–23L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Daniel Martchek
111W–68L career · 7 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
4
Lawrence Brock
326W–122L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
W Troutman
356W–116L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.91
4
Graham Schillmoller
170W–74L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Justin Fejfar
86W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Daniel Hill
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
William Caldwell
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.