Teams

LS:40 & over:Niezrecki

2025 ECT Adult 40 & Over Men · 3.5 Men Flt. 1

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-31vs OSRC:Slackers:NoniewiczLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlexander Fritsch / Kris Lewis vs Thomas Noniewicz / Kenneth Alsback6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTom Sedlack / James Craffey vs Matthias Podzuhn / Robert Fiocco3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHal Robb / Steven Johnson vs David Siniscalco / Keith Meehan4-6, 3-6
2025-05-17vs GF:Frame and Fortune:FasuloLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Fuller / Tom Sedlack vs Kevin Sullivan / CHRISTIAN CORMIER2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Andrew vs Douglas Terry6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHal Robb / Steven Johnson vs Andrew Bowler / Richard Ste Marie0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSergio Wolff / Makarand Jawadekar vs Daniel Fasulo / Brad Whiteman3-6, 3-6
2025-05-10vs GF:Frame and Fortune:FasuloSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKris Lewis / John Fuller vs Mihai Alex Stoian / Andrew Bowler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlexander Fritsch vs Brendan Choisnet6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHal Robb / Peter Anastas vs John Lewin / Stephen Murphy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTom Sedlack / Makarand Jawadekar vs Roger Reynolds / Brad Whiteman1-6, 4-6
2025-05-03vs GF:Frame and Fortune:FasuloLost 13
L#1 DoublesKris Lewis / Alexander Fritsch vs Andrew Bowler / Mihai Alex Stoian6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesChristopher Andrew vs Robin Goody6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTom Sedlack / Sergio Wolff vs Daniel Fasulo / Kevin Sullivan0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMakarand Jawadekar / Steven Johnson vs Stephen Murphy / Brad Whiteman1-6, 2-6
2025-04-13vs OSRC:Slackers:NoniewiczSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKris Lewis / Christopher Andrew vs Thomas Noniewicz / Paul Noniewicz3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlexander Fritsch vs Craig Cooke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Fuller / James Craffey vs Robert Fiocco / George Brooks7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesStanley Niezrecki / Richard McSweeney vs John Bubello / Keith Meehan4-6, 1-6
2025-02-16vs OSRC:Slackers:NoniewiczSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAlexander Fritsch / John Fuller vs Paul Noniewicz / George Brooks7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChristopher Andrew vs Craig Cooke6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStanley Niezrecki / Jeffrey Nelson vs Eric Masson / ORVILLE MATHERSON6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Craffey / Sergio Wolff vs Keith Meehan / Matthias Podzuhn2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men Flt. 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GF:Frame and Fortune:Fasulo0616818190
2OSRC:Slackers:Noniewicz06101430240
3LS:40 & over:Niezrecki06101431237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Christopher Andrew
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Alexander Fritsch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Kris Lewis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Tom Sedlack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Norton Wheeler
published
3.00
Stanley Niezrecki
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Peter Anastas
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
James Craffey
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
2.65
Richard McSweeney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hal Robb
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Makarand Jawadekar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sergio Wolff
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexander Fritsch + Kris Lewis8550% games+6.2% vs expected
Makarand Jawadekar + Stanley Niezrecki3352% games+0.2% vs expected
Makarand Jawadekar + Tom Sedlack1441% games−1.4% vs expected
Peter Anastas + Tom Sedlack5745% games−2.1% vs expected
Tom Sedlack + Sergio Wolff1538% games−4.9% vs expected
Makarand Jawadekar + Sergio Wolff2538% games−11.6% vs expected
Norton Wheeler + Sergio Wolff314 matchesnot enough data
Peter Anastas + Hal Robb224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Andrew
59W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
3.5
Alexander Fritsch
58W–49L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Kris Lewis
18W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Tom Sedlack
35W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Norton Wheeler
9W–29L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Stanley Niezrecki
25W–51L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Peter Anastas
59W–81L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
James Craffey
67W–49L career · 7 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Richard McSweeney
0W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Hal Robb
24W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Makarand Jawadekar
26W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sergio Wolff
16W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Johnson
32W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.