Teams

JAndrews/Henry

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-02vs AKalinowskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesLorah Henry / Settle Monroe vs Connie Haynes / Sara Mazurak6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Tucker Andrews vs Alison Kalinowski / Melanie Hewitt4-6, 2-6
2022-09-25vs BLeippeWon 21
L#1 DoublesLorah Henry / Settle Monroe vs Bladen Leippe / Cam Frye7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Badham / Catherine White vs Wendy Sielaty / Cassie Pence2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Clarke / Tucker Andrews vs Marguerite Rogers / Allison Dugan6-3, 7-5
2022-09-07vs SBragaWon 20
W#1 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Suzanne Braga / Jaime Clark6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSettle Monroe / Spruill Mayhew vs Paige Alford / Chrissy Hartsfield6-3, 6-4
2022-08-28vs AKalinowskiLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrooke Jenkins / Jennifer Badham vs Sheila Breckenridge / Sara Mazurak6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine White / Settle Monroe vs Jennifer Anderson / Brianna Shait4-6, 2-6
2022-08-21vs BLeippeLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathleen Warren / Jennifer Badham vs Lisa Bakowski / Gabrielle Bohdel6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSettle Monroe / Julianne Andrews vs Bladen Leippe / Cam Frye1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesTucker Andrews / Katherine Teague vs Marie Gelston / Marguerite Rogers2-6, 2-6
2022-08-14vs SLittletonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCatherine White / Jennifer Badham vs Shannon Littleton / Rossi Evans7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatherine Teague / Settle Monroe vs Cathy Williams / Corinne Alavi0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Badham
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.25
Settle Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Julianne Andrews
published
3.01
MA Allen
published
2.35
Tucker Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 2.5
2.35
Katherine Teague
published
Anna Applegate
published 2.5
Lorah Henry
published
Spruill Mayhew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Settle Monroe + Jennifer Badham314 matchesnot enough data
Settle Monroe + Tucker Andrews224 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Teague + Tucker Andrews123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Badham
88W–15L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%13%87%
3.65
3.5
Settle Monroe
65W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Julianne Andrews
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
MA Allen
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01
2.5
Tucker Andrews
44W–61L career · 8 lines in 2022
0%87%13%
2.35
Katherine Teague
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
0%88%12%
2.35
2.5
Anna Applegate
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorah Henry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Spruill Mayhew
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.