Teams

McNeill (Cole) 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AM

2024 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women 55 & Over

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-10vs Harris 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMWon 10
W#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Julia Barnes vs Lisa Cook / Robin Crosier7-6, 6-3
L#1 DoublesLynn Tester / Shawn McFarlin vs Martha Fogleman / Maureen Vandeplancke4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Nancy McNeill vs Aprille Black / Wendy Wood6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Julia Barnes vs Nancy McCoy / Mary Ann Nixon6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMary Batts / Kimberly Gay vs Theresa Dockrill / Shelby Rhyne6-4, 7-5
2024-08-02vs Harris 55s 7.5 Combo W Fri AMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Julia Barnes vs Lisa Liringis / Robin Crosier6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKathy Hedgecock / Kimberly Gay vs Stacey Harris / Carolyn Pellerin6-7, 2-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.70
Ann Evans
published 4
3.65
Dell Barbee
published 4
3.57
Kimberly Gay
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.56
Lynn Chafin
published
3.52
Kathy Hedgecock
published
3.50
Lynda Pegram
published
3.48
Mary Batts
published
3.39
3.37
Julia Barnes
published
3.35
April McAfee
published 3.5
3.30
Lynn Tester
published
3.29
Nancy McNeill
published
3.18
Theresa Atchison
published
2.75
Susan Payne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn McFarlin + Kimberly Gay4157% gamesnot enough data
Ann Evans + Nancy McNeill404 matchesnot enough data
Lynda Pegram + Lynn Tester213 matchesnot enough data
Shawn McFarlin + Julia Barnes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Ann Evans
24W–17L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dell Barbee
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Kimberly Gay
376W–167L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.57
Lynn Chafin
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.56
Kathy Hedgecock
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%43%57%
3.52
Lynda Pegram
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.50
Mary Batts
30W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Gwen Highsmith-Quick
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.39
Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
April McAfee
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Lynn Tester
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Nancy McNeill
24W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Theresa Atchison
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Susan Payne
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.