Teams

SKY BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-19vs DTC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fitzgerald / Beth Godzich vs Elaine Golden Webster / Alison Morrison0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDenise Briere vs Elisabeth Vezzani6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Daukas / Erin Mann vs Kristin Bokelman / Sheila Tsai0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMychael Jones / Angie Sanders vs Kristin O Connell / Kelli Barton6-3, 6-4
2022-07-12vs APR BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pearson / Erin Mann vs Danielle Remington / Molly Garg6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDenise Briere vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Crockett / Paula Daukas vs Cherlyn Linden / Jessica Rae1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Godzich / Jennifer Fitzgerald vs Katie Schroder / Sarah Sullivan6-0, 6-3
2022-07-05vs CACM BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Visser / Denise Briere vs Maria Orton / Elizabeth Anderman6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Godzich / Erin Mann vs Gina Bach / Michelle Curtiss7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Fitzgerald / Catherine Hodges vs Maureen Kiefer / Pallavi Marulasiddappa5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-28vs GTC PINKWon 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pearson / Sara Visser vs Joyce Kennedy Raymes / Suzann Gobis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCatherine Hodges vs Courtney Hughes6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Crockett / Erin Mann vs Peggy Moody / Courtney Kanouff6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJennifer Fitzgerald / Jocelyn Murphy vs Joan Murphy / Anne Beletic6-1, 6-2
2022-06-21vs CP REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAmy Crockett / Jocelyn Murphy vs Susan Pesso / Amy Twardowski3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMychael Jones vs Olga Zhivnitskaya2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPaula Daukas / Catherine Hodges vs Lena Ursten Hobbs / Deborah Clark6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSara Visser / Beth Godzich vs Catherine Kraft / KRISTEN ALIX6-2, 6-3
2022-06-14vs WP SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Visser / Denise Briere vs Stephanie Baur / Valerie Kilzer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Murphy / Paula Daukas vs Brooke Webb / Tiffany Smink6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMychael Jones / Angie Sanders vs Kristin Nelson / Christine Johnson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2022-06-07vs GTC REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Pearson / Denise Briere vs Julie Woodle / Liza Baker6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAmy Crockett vs Jill St. John4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMychael Jones / Jocelyn Murphy vs Ellen Lee / Jennifer Meyer6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngie Sanders / Catherine Hodges vs Brenda Emerson / Kaye Wonder6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Catherine Hodges
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Denise Briere
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.85
Sara Visser
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Jocelyn Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Amy Crockett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.79
Jennifer Fitzgerald
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.69
Mychael Jones
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Erin Mann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Beth Godzich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Paula Daukas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Mann + Denise Briere8259% games+11.1% vs expected
Denise Briere + Jennifer Fitzgerald5071% games+9.2% vs expected
Jocelyn Murphy + Amy Crockett7260% games+3.9% vs expected
Erin Mann + Amy Crockett9359% games+2.5% vs expected
Erin Mann + Beth Godzich3447% games+1.0% vs expected
Sara Visser + Denise Briere6952% games−1.0% vs expected
Beth Godzich + Jennifer Fitzgerald151250% games−1.0% vs expected
Sara Visser + Beth Godzich3447% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Catherine Hodges
66W–31L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
3
Denise Briere
55W–49L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Sara Visser
65W–62L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Jocelyn Murphy
75W–43L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy Crockett
58W–46L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Jennifer Fitzgerald
36W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Mychael Jones
50W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Erin Mann
56W–45L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Beth Godzich
67W–77L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Paula Daukas
41W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.