Teams

Gladwell

2026 St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over · St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-31vs TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Kevin Findley vs Diana Chan / Adrian Stanton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJena Carrington / Rick Gladwell vs Rachel Lytle / James Borell6-1, 6-2
2026-05-21vs TaylorLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Maier / John Neville vs Joseph Taylor / Diana Chan4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Kevin Findley vs Rachel Lytle / Kenneth Mccafferty6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Cui / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins vs John Zittere / Lauren Hook6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-05-14vs TaylorWon 20
W#1 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Trey Bergen vs Steve Cassetta / Lauren Hook3-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Maier / John Neville vs Joseph Taylor / Rachel Lytle5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-10vs TaylorWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Michael Cui vs Diana Chan / Kenneth Mccafferty4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrandie Sparr / Benjamin Brierty vs Steve Cassetta / Rebecca Burghardt6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Maier / John Neville vs Joseph Taylor / Rachel Lytle3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-05-06vs TaylorLost 12
W#1 DoublesJena Carrington / Rick Gladwell vs Diana Chan / Kenneth Mccafferty6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Cui / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins vs John Zittere / Lauren Hook2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Juan Cabungcal vs Steve Cassetta / Rebecca Burghardt6-7, 4-6
2026-05-03vs TaylorWon 30
W#1 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Trey Bergen vs Diana Chan / Kenneth Mccafferty1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Cui / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins vs John Zittere / Casey MCFANN6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMegan Gladwell / Benjamin Brierty vs Steve Cassetta / Lauren Hook7-5, 7-6
2026-04-19vs TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesJena Carrington / Rick Gladwell vs Steve Cassetta / Rachel Lytle6-3, 4-0
L#2 DoublesJuan Cabungcal / Brandie Sparr vs Diana Chan / John Zittere3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSabra Szczyglowski / Kevin Findley vs Casey MCFANN / Don Behrens6-3, 6-1
2026-04-12vs TaylorSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Maier / John Neville vs Joseph Taylor / Rachel Lytle6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJena Carrington / Michael Cui vs Lauren Hook / Adrian Stanton3-6, 4-6
2026-03-29vs TaylorWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrandie Sparr / John Neville vs Adrian Stanton / Lauren Hook6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Cui / Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins vs John Zittere / Casey MCFANN6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJuan Cabungcal / Susan Maier vs Amy Egeli / Steve Cassetta6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · St. Marys Mixed 18 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gladwell7219819200

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Rick Gladwell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Brandie Sparr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kevin Findley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Susan Maier
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.52
Megan Gladwell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Sabra Szczyglowski
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Benjamin Brierty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jena Carrington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Neville
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Juan Cabungcal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Cui
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Trey Bergen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Maier + John Neville314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Cui + Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins224 matchesnot enough data
Rick Gladwell + Jena Carrington303 matchesnot enough data
Sabra Szczyglowski + Kevin Findley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rick Gladwell
7W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Brandie Sparr
104W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Kevin Findley
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Susan Maier
14W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Megan Gladwell
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sabra Szczyglowski
32W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Benjamin Brierty
2W–0L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jena Carrington
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Neville
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Juan Cabungcal
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Cui
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trey Bergen
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.