Canyon Creek/Robbins W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule2 played

2026-06-13Lost 0–1

L#3 DoublesRachel Brownlee / Katharine Saunders vs Lea Ellsworth / Cindy Graham1-6, 6-4, 0-1

2026-05-09Won 1–0

W#2 SinglesKatharine Saunders vs Natalia Jimenez6-0, 6-1

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56

Jacqueline Carson

usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #1 Singles 10% · published —

3.54

Sarah Snitker

published —

3.42

Camille Davenport

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5

3.34

Jennifer Spoons

usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published —

3.34

Gretchen Allen

usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published —

3.33

Jenifer Mathews

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published —

3.29

Melissa Fox

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published —

3.25

Ashley Samber

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.24

Nicole Shafer-Thomas

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 14% · published —

3.14

Shelley Staten

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published —

3.14

Katharine Saunders

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.13

Kim Henke

usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published —

3.02

Rachel Brownlee

usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published —

2.87

Monica Miles

usually #1 Singles 69%, also #2 Singles 25% · published —

—

Hazel Robbins

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published —

—

Meghan Rosener

usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Sheridan Lang

usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 14% · published —

—

Tarryn Uran

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Davenport + Jacqueline Carson	11–0	69% games	+18.1% vs expected
Ashley Samber + Sarah Snitker	9–2	66% games	+9.4% vs expected
Gretchen Allen + Ashley Samber	7–2	62% games	+9.1% vs expected
Sarah Snitker + Jacqueline Carson	7–1	64% games	+2.1% vs expected
Hazel Robbins + Tarryn Uran	5–2	60% games	not enough data
Rachel Brownlee + Kim Henke	2–3	40% games	not enough data
Shelley Staten + Kim Henke	3–2	57% games	not enough data
Gretchen Allen + Jennifer Spoons	3–1	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Jacqueline Carson

38W–6L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%33%67%

3.56

—

Sarah Snitker

30W–5L career · no lines in 2026

<1%39%61%

3.54

3.5

Camille Davenport

20W–1L career · 9 lines in 2026

<1%73%27%

3.42

—

Jennifer Spoons

27W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%86%13%

3.34

—

Gretchen Allen

35W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026

1%87%12%

3.34

—

Jenifer Mathews

15W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026

1%88%12%

3.33

—

Melissa Fox

24W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026

2%91%7%

3.29

3.5

Ashley Samber

26W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026

4%93%4%

3.25

—

Nicole Shafer-Thomas

16W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026

5%92%3%

3.24

—

Shelley Staten

6W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026

16%84%1%

3.14

—

Katharine Saunders

8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026

16%83%<1%

3.14

—

Kim Henke

8W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026

17%83%<1%

3.13

—

Rachel Brownlee

8W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026

44%56%<1%

3.02

—

Monica Miles

16W–19L career · 16 lines in 2026

<1%81%18%

2.87

—

Hazel Robbins

13W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Meghan Rosener

12W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Sheridan Lang

25W–2L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Tarryn Uran

23W–7L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.