Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX7.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23vs GREEN VALLEY CC 18MX7.0BWon 21
W#1 DoublesEleanor Cooper / Dennis Totah vs Jeffrey Wei / Rowena Wei6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMagaly Otero / Grant Totten vs Yolanda Irigon / Alfredo Vigil6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMacKenzie Flanagan / Martin Maire vs David Davis / Maureen Dugoni6-1, 6-4
2025-02-19vs GREEN VALLEY CC 18MX7.0BWon 20
W#2 DoublesEleanor Cooper / Doug Fraggi vs George Kalis / Julie Neeb6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKristi Kaiser / Robert Stasko vs JoAnn Clark / David Davis2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Justin Small
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Kristen Calise
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Eleanor Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.40
MacKenzie Flanagan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Annika Fischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Dennis Totah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Samanda Dorger
published
3.19
Magaly Otero
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Jessica Thornton
published
3.02
Robert Stasko
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Kathleen Walsh
published
2.88
Kristi Kaiser
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Doug Fraggi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Grant Totten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Sahim
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Small
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.77
Kristen Calise
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Eleanor Cooper
24W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
MacKenzie Flanagan
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
3.40
3.5
Annika Fischer
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Dennis Totah
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Samanda Dorger
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Magaly Otero
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jessica Thornton
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Robert Stasko
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.02
Kathleen Walsh
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
Kristi Kaiser
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Doug Fraggi
6W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Grant Totten
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Sahim
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.