Teams

Brevard - Palmer / Wolszczak

2021 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-03-13vs RCCB - SimmonsWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnna Butler / LInda Madyda vs Barbara Daly / Gillian Dionne7-6, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMargaret Staples vs Tara DelGado2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLisa Davidson-DURAN / Joni Smith vs Sylvia Segura / Carol Baggett5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2021-03-06vs Suntree - VanSuetendaelSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDebbie Sibley / Susan Noble vs Anna Brenner / Victoria Schnittger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMargaret Staples vs Nancy van Suetendael6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYvette van der Wiel / Stacie Neff vs Carmal Lewis / Gaylyn Woodruff5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnna Butler / LInda Madyda vs Diane Breitfeller / Sandra Rowe6-2, 6-2
2021-02-27vs TTC - McIntoshWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoni Smith / Lisa Davidson-DURAN vs Tanya Molony / Tina Zeno6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Wolszczak / Stacie Neff vs Nan Fleming / Marlee Miller6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Sibley / Susan Noble vs Britta Barnby / Karen Wynne6-3, 6-0
2021-02-25vs Suntree - VanSuetendaelWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Davidson-DURAN / Debbie Sibley vs Amy Gregory / Diane Breitfeller7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatti van Zante / Joni Smith vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-02-20vs RCCB - SimmonsWon 31
W#1 DoublesLori Ewing / Lisa Davidson-DURAN vs Gillian Dionne / Sylvia Segura7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLInda Madyda vs Tara DelGado7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJulie Wolszczak / Stacie Neff vs Patricia Spoerle / Beth Delgado6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Sibley / Susan Noble vs Cynthia Simmons / Carol Baggett7-5, 6-4
2021-02-06vs TTC - McIntoshWon 40
W#1 DoublesLori Ewing / LInda Madyda vs Janel Singer / Amy McIntosh6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSusan Noble vs Sara Hatfield6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Wolszczak / Stacie Neff vs Debbie Giorgio / Nan Fleming6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoni Smith / Debbie Sibley vs Tanya Molony / Suzanne New6-1, 6-2
2021-01-30vs RCCB - SimmonsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Davidson-DURAN / Susan Noble vs Gillian Dionne / Heather Schleicher6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesLInda Madyda vs Tara DelGado6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDebbie Sibley / Tracy King - (DQ)* vs Barbara Daly / Sherry Toms7-6, 6-2
2021-01-23vs Suntree - VanSuetendaelWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Davidson-DURAN / Joni Smith vs Gaylyn Woodruff / Deanna Rehak7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Noble vs Amy Gregory1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLInda Madyda / Patti van Zante vs Victoria Schnittger / Nancy van Suetendael6-2, 6-1
2021-01-16vs TTC - McIntoshWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnna Butler / Patti van Zante vs Jennifer Csanyi / Sara Hatfield6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLInda Madyda vs Amy McIntosh6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Davidson-DURAN / Joni Smith vs Nan Fleming / Robin Stember6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesStacie Neff / Julie Wolszczak vs Marlee Miller / Cheri McLachlan6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Lisa Davidson-DURAN
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.93
Debbie Sibley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.91
Anna Butler
published 4
3.85
Julie Wolszczak
published 4
3.76
Susan Noble
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Stacie Neff
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
LInda Madyda
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.71
Yvette van der Wiel
published
3.61
Margaret Staples
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.48
Tracy King
published
Patti van Zante
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Wolszczak + Stacie Neff12461% games−1.5% vs expected
Debbie Sibley + Susan Noble12460% gamesnot enough data
Susan Noble + LInda Madyda123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Davidson-DURAN
75W–31L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Debbie Sibley
138W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Anna Butler
11W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Julie Wolszczak
64W–27L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
Susan Noble
91W–51L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Stacie Neff
63W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
LInda Madyda
68W–55L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Yvette van der Wiel
35W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Margaret Staples
81W–97L career · 2 lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Tracy King
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
3.48
Patti van Zante
26W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.