Teams

Hoover Met - Swaminathan - 7.5 Combo Summer 2026

2026 B'ham Combo - 18 & Over - Weeknight · 7.5 Men - Monday

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-10vs BH - Nelson/TaylorLost 03
L#1 DoublesDrew Beckwith / Kishore Kumar Thota vs Patrick Taylor / Palaniappan Sethu4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesTommy Cox / David Cox vs Clay Stout / Benjamin Barrow2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Hammack / Marc Dobson vs Mitchell Lewis / Troy Vaughn1-6, 5-7
2026-08-03vs MBY - CottrellWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Smith / Tommy Cox vs Keith Chasteen / Matt Grill6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSid Swaminathan / Kishore Kumar Thota vs Greg Cottrell / Wes Hill3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMarc Dobson / Drew Beckwith vs Ryan Crosby / Adam Hajji7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-27vs Hoover Met - IngramLost 03
L#1 DoublesJoe Smith / Drew Beckwith vs Trent Hopton-Jones / CRISTIAN SANCHEZ4-6, 5-3
L#2 DoublesJack Bransdorf / Marc Dobson vs Kevin Carden / Will Hammock3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Harbison / David Cox vs Daryl Ingram / Blanton Reed2-6, 4-6
2026-07-20vs BH - Nelson/TaylorLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeff Hammack / Jack Bransdorf vs Hayden Gunter / Lukus Nelson0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTommy Cox / Shawn Bradley vs William Hoffmeister / Lobo Tran1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJoe Smith / Drew Beckwith vs Robert Moody / Clay Stout1-6, 2-6
2026-07-13vs MBY - CottrellLost 12
L#1 DoublesShawn Bradley / Sid Swaminathan vs Keith Chasteen / Crawford Crim4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Harbison / Tyler Hutto vs Graham Minor / Ryan Crosby3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJoe Smith / Drew Beckwith vs Paul Davis / Travis Bartlett6-3, 6-1
2026-07-06vs Hoover Met - IngramWon 21
L#1 DoublesJack Bransdorf / Vincent Morgan vs Kevin Carden / Will Hammock0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTommy Cox / David Cox vs Matthew Davis / Trent Hopton-Jones3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoe Smith / Drew Beckwith vs Joshua Coger / Jack Stogner6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Men - Monday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lifetime - Nelson/Taylor 18+ 7.5 Combo601626117
2MBY - Cottrell3311719166
3Hoover Met - Swaminathan - 7.5 Combo Summer 20262451329198

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Prabhdeep Singh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Shawn Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Tommy Cox
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Drew Beckwith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Kishore Kumar Thota
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Tyler Hutto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.32
David Cox
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Jack Bransdorf
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Jeff Hammack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Vincent Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Brian Harbison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Marc Dobson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Sid Swaminathan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tommy Cox + David Cox9654% games−0.4% vs expected
Jeff Hammack + Jack Bransdorf7748% games−1.7% vs expected
Tommy Cox + Jeff Hammack2541% games−10.6% vs expected
Sid Swaminathan + Vincent Morgan3345% gamesnot enough data
Jack Bransdorf + Vincent Morgan1441% gamesnot enough data
Sid Swaminathan + Jack Bransdorf134 matchesnot enough data
Tommy Cox + Jack Bransdorf123 matchesnot enough data
Drew Beckwith + Tyler Hutto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Prabhdeep Singh
41W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Shawn Bradley
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
Tommy Cox
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Drew Beckwith
13W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kishore Kumar Thota
21W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
Tyler Hutto
39W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3.5
David Cox
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.32
Jack Bransdorf
23W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.27
Jeff Hammack
19W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Vincent Morgan
19W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Brian Harbison
23W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.15
Marc Dobson
12W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Sid Swaminathan
22W–39L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.