Teams

KY/LOU/POWERS

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-12-14vs KY/LOU/DIEHLWon 21
L#1 DoublesMitchell McCoy / Charles Fernandez vs Charles Goodwin / Joel Neaveill6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Vickers vs Elijah Brown7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdam Kirby / Jonathan Hahn vs Stephen Diehl / Matthew Bunnell6-3, 6-2
2025-10-18vs KY/LOU/DIEHLWon 30
W#1 DoublesMitchell McCoy / Jonathan Hahn vs Stephen Diehl / Charles Goodwin6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesCharles Fernandez vs Zachary Allen7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Engelbrecht / Adam Kirby vs Brad Eckmann / Jeremy Stein6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Caley Coughlan
published 4
3.61
Charles Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.52
Scott Warner
published
3.47
John Hetzel
published
3.37
Jonathan Hahn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Justin Powers
published
3.32
Ryan Engelbrecht
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Mitchell McCoy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Adam Kirby
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Michael Vickers
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.25
Eddie Goodman
published
3.07
Sam Gabrielli
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Powers + Scott Warner4153% gamesnot enough data
Scott Warner + Caley Coughlan404 matchesnot enough data
Michael Vickers + John Hetzel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caley Coughlan
19W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Charles Fernandez
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.61
Scott Warner
44W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
John Hetzel
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jonathan Hahn
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Justin Powers
24W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Ryan Engelbrecht
16W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Mitchell McCoy
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Adam Kirby
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Michael Vickers
16W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Eddie Goodman
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Sam Gabrielli
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.