Teams

WNCC Nelson (CCA)

Combo 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Men 6.5 Combo Mon

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-17vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Won 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Ripmaster / Briggs Schoen vs Daniel Spagnoli / Carl Michael Uy6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCraig Nelson / Ian Mcansh vs Michael Gilpin / Jin Choi6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTait Piercy / Pete Pinholster vs Edward McMillan / Matt Cook6-1, 6-1
2026-08-10vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPeter Ripmaster / Briggs Schoen vs Dennis Mason / Jordan Stiles3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Nelson / Mark Whyman vs Dave Kroondyk / Brennan Trantham4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTait Piercy / Chris Raymer vs Chris Westmoreland / Matt Roland6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-08-03vs WNCF Mabunga (ARC South)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Ripmaster / Daniel Berchenko vs Breen OBrien / Peter Cook6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTait Piercy / Chris Raymer vs Daniel Maness / Richard Brumm6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Men 6.5 Combo Mon have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Tait Piercy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Peter Ripmaster
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Craig Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Ian Mcansh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Briggs Schoen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Daniel Berchenko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Craig Mcansh
published 3.5
2.88
Mark Whyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chris Raymer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Pete Pinholster
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Chris Tinsley
published 3
2.59
Rick Manske
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tait Piercy + Craig Nelson3451% games−1.1% vs expected
Chris Tinsley + Rick Manske1427% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Berchenko + Craig Nelson314 matchesnot enough data
Tait Piercy + Daniel Berchenko123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tait Piercy
14W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Peter Ripmaster
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Craig Nelson
27W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%4%
3.26
Ian Mcansh
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Briggs Schoen
4W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Daniel Berchenko
21W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3.5
Craig Mcansh
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.89
Mark Whyman
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Chris Raymer
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Pete Pinholster
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Chris Tinsley
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Rick Manske
9W–14L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.