Teams

Westwood Hause

2022 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weekday · Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday

12 players · average NTRP 4.22 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-04vs WOCC SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiza Hause / Megan Alwine vs Darlene Moehling / Kristen Hager6-2, 6-2
2022-10-21vs Southampton LaneLost 02
L#2 DoublesAbigail Dryden / Sarah Oatts vs Nicole Marks / Julie Ruth3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLiza Hause / Emily Dunstan vs Brooke Kelly / Beth Jones1-6, 2-6
2022-10-14vs CCV CooperWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiza Hause / Megan Alwine vs Shula Good / Windy Campbell6-1, 6-2
2022-10-07vs CCV DeLaceyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMegan Alwine / Liza Hause vs Donna Butler / Amanda Galanti4-6, 3-6
2022-10-06vs Hermitage HolmesWon 20
W#2 DoublesSarah Oatts / Rene Philhower vs Jan Marshall / Janet Todd6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Dunstan / Haidee Cline vs Teki Hall / Amy Click6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-20vs Raintree MorrisWon 10
W#3 DoublesLiza Hause / Megan Alwine vs Lisa Harmon / Jennifer Morris6-2, 6-4
2022-09-09vs SCC CapozelloSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLaura Strickler / Sarah Oatts vs Sarah Capozello / Taryn Lloyd6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiza Hause / Megan Alwine vs Sarah Boyd / Julie Kearfott7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.83
Clara Laing
published 5
4.31
Megan Alwine
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Elizabeth Kelly
published 4.5
Anna Shea
published 4.5
3.96
Abigail Dryden
published 4
3.93
Sarah Oatts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.88
Brigitte Fanelli
published 4
3.67
Laura Strickler
published
3.51
Liza Hause
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Haidee Cline
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Laura Perry
published
Rene Philhower
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liza Hause + Megan Alwine8458% games+8.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Kelly + Megan Alwine404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Clara Laing
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.83
4.5
Megan Alwine
111W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Elizabeth Kelly
35W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Anna Shea
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Abigail Dryden
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.96
4
Sarah Oatts
81W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Brigitte Fanelli
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.88
Laura Strickler
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Liza Hause
210W–142L career · 6 lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Haidee Cline
91W–91L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Laura Perry
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rene Philhower
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.