Teams

ROUND HILL CC CW7.5B

2022 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesCindy Rountree / Jennifer Davis vs Beth Hill / Stefanie Cohen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Davis / Caroline MacKe vs Cassie Kim / Jessica Kim1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Esther Parti
published 4
3.84
Kristen Foster
published
Christine Currie
published 4
Cindy Rountree
published 4
3.71
Caroline MacKe
published 4
3.67
3.67
Stephanie Kasirajan
published
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.61
Nicole Shay
published
3.36
Camille Schulz
published 4
3.33
Katherine Ryan
published
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.29
Shawn Young
published
3.27
Yolla Elahmadie
published
Deborah Ahmadi
published 3.5
3.22
Jennifer Davis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.02
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
Jana Vojdani
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Esther Parti
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.89
Kristen Foster
20W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Christine Currie
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Cindy Rountree
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Caroline MacKe
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Stephanie Kasirajan
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Viviana Meyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Nicole Shay
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Camille Schulz
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.36
Katherine Ryan
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.33
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Deborah Ahmadi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Jennifer Davis
49W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Trish Nornhold
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.