Teams

Rhoads

2023 Adult 65 & Over · Women 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-29vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesTerri Regelski / Denise Walkenhorst vs Patti Guidroz / Janis Willmann1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJan Baggett / Ilene Bolin vs Gail Frapolli / Norma Prifti2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Barbara Rhoads vs Rose Albrecht / Barbara Schillhahn6-3, 6-3
2023-03-22vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Kroc / Terri Regelski vs Patti Guidroz / Janis Willmann3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Dana / Barbara Rhoads vs Betsy Bryan / Barbara Schillhahn5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesIlene Bolin / Denise Walkenhorst vs Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Gail Frapolli1-6, 1-6
2023-03-15vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Kroc / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Jan Bushnell / Patti Guidroz3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJan Baggett / Terri Regelski vs Rose Albrecht / Margaret Ropelle0-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudith Dana / Diana Kennedy vs Chris Beckner / Barbara Criner6-7, 3-4
2023-03-08vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Kroc / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Norma Prifti6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Lewis / Terri Regelski vs Jan Bushnell / Barbara Criner2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesIlene Bolin / Denise Walkenhorst vs Betsy Bryan / Barbara Schillhahn4-6, 4-6
2023-02-22vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Kroc / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Jan Bushnell / Patti Guidroz7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBarbara Rhoads / Jan Baggett vs Margaret Ropelle / Rose Albrecht0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDenise Walkenhorst / Jane Anton vs Betsy Bryan / Janis Willmann3-6, 4-6
2023-02-15vs MOValley/Albrecht/65&Over6.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Kroc / JUDY STAROSCIK vs Patti Guidroz / Janis Willmann6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJudith Dana / Rebecca Lewis vs Norma Prifti / Barbara Schillhahn1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Denise Walkenhorst vs Mary Kimberly Bohnenkamp / Gail Frapolli4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Nancy Kroc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Diana Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Terri Regelski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
JUDY STAROSCIK
published
2.34
Denise Walkenhorst
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.30
Barbara Rhoads
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.25
Ilene Bolin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Judith Dana
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jan Baggett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Regelski + Diana Kennedy123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Kroc
111W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Diana Kennedy
12W–40L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terri Regelski
64W–119L career · 4 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
JUDY STAROSCIK
25W–44L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.48
2.5
Denise Walkenhorst
21W–88L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Barbara Rhoads
40W–67L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%92%8%
2.30
Ilene Bolin
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25
Judith Dana
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
Jan Baggett
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.