Teams

V - Las Posas Country Club Angels

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

16 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-26vs V - WACtown GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Howey / Theresa Yamamoto vs Mary Scotti / Marty Fraser6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-06vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesYvette Hays / Keri Kettle vs Judith Cade / Jacqueline Francis4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-02-26vs V - Spanish Hills Glamour SlammersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesFelicula Tovar / J Chen vs Mary Ann Fermin / Maria Dickey1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Torres / Theresa Yamamoto vs Saudamini Sindhar / Dana Hibner6-1, 6-1
2022-02-19vs V - Wood Ranch Match PointWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Custance / Felicula Tovar vs Mary Coladonato / Meegan Hamilton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGina Howey / Beverly Torres vs Kelley Bannon / Tracy Bodis6-0, 6-3
2022-01-30vs V - Sunset AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Root / Felicula Tovar vs Marcela Cepeda / Catherine Loubier6-1, 6-2
2022-01-15vs V - Sunset Ooh La LaLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Custance / Yvette Hays vs Susan Consoletti / Jean Bridges6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesGina Howey vs Elizabeth Pierce5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Nash / Beverly Torres vs Raymi Schwartz / Beatriz Rivera2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesYvette Hays / Amy Galan vs Shelly Crema / Holly Culhane7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeverly Torres / Felicula Tovar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Amy Galan
published 3.5
2.96
Yvette Hays
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Beverly Torres
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Felicula Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Gina Howey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Katy Greenwood
published
2.64
Karen Root
published
2.59
Mary Nash
published
2.57
Carol Pollock
published 3
2.54
Janet Talmadge
published
2.52
J Chen
published 3
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.50
Keri Kettle
published
2.39
Riitta Andonian
published
2.28
Penny Teague
published
Theresa Yamamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+4.5% vs expected
Felicula Tovar + Mary Nash0539% games−13.6% vs expected
Carol Pollock + Janet Talmadge123 matchesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Felicula Tovar + Beverly Torres213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Galan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Yvette Hays
61W–71L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
2.86
3
Felicula Tovar
32W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Katy Greenwood
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Karen Root
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Carol Pollock
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
J Chen
3W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
2.51
Keri Kettle
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.39
Penny Teague
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%95%5%
2.28
Theresa Yamamoto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.