Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Jo

2024 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WD - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#3 DoublesShelly Hilliard / Nancy Shih vs Paula Nishibayashi / Sharon Fujihara6-1, 7-6
2024-11-22vs OC Costa Mesa TC - SabrinaWon 10
W#3 DoublesNancy Shih / Ida Shu vs Joy Davis / Sabrina Newton6-3, 6-4
2024-11-01vs OC Yorba Linda CC- HollyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Read / Nancy Shih vs Holly Bruning / Eveline Gani4-6, 4-6
2024-10-04vs OC Coto De Caza - TracieLost 01
L#2 DoublesJosephine Garrett / Nancy Shih vs Tracie Reed-Furlong / Karah Curtis5-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WD - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
Christine Callas
published 4
3.70
Ida Shu
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.66
Kelly Lombardo
published
3.64
Cheryl Gates
published 4
3.60
Nancy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Lindsay Kimmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.52
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.43
Shelly Hilliard
published
3.41
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.37
Lisa Rhoads
published
3.33
Janna McConnell
published
3.29
Mary Read
published
3.26
Michaela Vitrano
published
3.22
Josephine Garrett
published
3.21
Jacqueline Jernigan
published
3.16
Lisa Wellman
published
Mary Amen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Gates + Janna McConnell3548% games+9.3% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Lauren Prelesnik2542% games−2.1% vs expected
Ida Shu + Nancy Shih5448% games−6.9% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Nancy Shih314 matchesnot enough data
Josephine Garrett + Kelly Lombardo044 matchesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Ida Shu123 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Kimmes + Josephine Garrett123 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Kimmes + Ida Shu123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–50L career · 14 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Kelly Lombardo
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Cheryl Gates
16W–12L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Nancy Shih
67W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Lindsay Kimmes
40W–45L career · 10 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 13 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
Lisa Rhoads
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
Janna McConnell
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%1%99%
3.33
Mary Read
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Michaela Vitrano
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.22
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Lisa Wellman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Mary Amen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.