Teams

MLong-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day

7 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-18vs JPermutt-CHTCWon 10
W#2 SinglesNancy Draughon vs Joelle Permutt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-13vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesCaroline Patzer vs Donna Spero1-6, 4-6
2026-06-05vs JPermutt-CHTCWon 10
W#2 SinglesSusana Harvey vs Dina Golden6-0, 6-0
2026-06-04vs CPeterson-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Diane Allen6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesNancy Draughon vs Donna Spero2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-24vs JPermutt-CHTCWon 20
W#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Joelle Permutt6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSusana Harvey vs Mary Griffiths6-2, 6-0
2026-05-22vs CPeterson-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Barbara Wilhelm6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Susana Harvey
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.59
Deb Lanier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Nancy Draughon
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Meghan Smith
published 3.5
3.37
Caroline Patzer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.71
Richelle Robinson
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Lanier + Susana Harvey27668% games+2.9% vs expected
Nancy Draughon + Susana Harvey551264% games+2.2% vs expected
Nancy Draughon + Deb Lanier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susana Harvey
401W–157L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
3.5
Deb Lanier
487W–223L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.59
3.5
Nancy Draughon
210W–73L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Meghan Smith
160W–93L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Caroline Patzer
142W–90L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Richelle Robinson
125W–138L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.