Teams

SFV Ace Ace Baby

SFV-Adult 18 & Over · SFV - Women 4.5 Weekend

12 players · average NTRP 4.40 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesMonica Georgescu / Lauren DiFazio vs Eriko Shigenaga / Chiaki Ishihara6-2, 6-4
L#1 DoublesApril Hartstein / Michelle Zhong vs Blair Brzeski / Sarah Owings0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLauren DiFazio vs Thea Lasky6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-05-08vs LLW - SFV Awesome Vamos! - Su CumboSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLauren DiFazio vs Thea Lasky6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Yuri Nichelson vs Chiaki Ishihara / Eriko Shigenaga6-3, 6-4
2021-05-02Won 10
W#1 SinglesLauren DiFazio vs Amanda MacDonald6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesApril Hartstein / Michelle Zhong vs Jennifer Portillo / Adeline Arjad Cook7-6, 6-4
2021-04-17vs LLW - SFV Awesome Vamos! - Su CumboSplit 11
L#1 SinglesApril Hartstein vs Eriko Shigenaga3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Yuri Nichelson vs Suzanne Cumbo / Claudia Vine6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesYuri Nichelson / Julie Juliani vs Suzanne Cumbo / Lisa Robertson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV - Women 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
4.53
Lauren DiFazio
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.44
Yuri Nichelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Karen Hankinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
April Hartstein
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.20
Jennifer Day
published
4.18
Anusha Arcalgud
published 4.5
4.08
Michelle Tong Luo
published
3.97
Lily Wu
published
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.86
Diane Perryman
published 4
Julie Juliani
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Hartstein + Yuri Nichelson4263% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hankinson + Yuri Nichelson4156% gamesnot enough data
Karen Hankinson + Diane Perryman134 matchesnot enough data
Yuri Nichelson + Diane Perryman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Widmark Hillman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.74
Lauren DiFazio
122W–58L career · 4 lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
4.53
4.5
Yuri Nichelson
207W–73L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
April Hartstein
227W–139L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
Jennifer Day
23W–14L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Anusha Arcalgud
9W–15L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Michelle Tong Luo
13W–9L career · no lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
4.08
Lily Wu
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2021
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Diane Perryman
91W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.