Teams

3 ACAC Callaghan/Granger

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-08-14vs 4 Avalon GhitaWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Martin / Martinique Kandl vs Cathy George / Jeanne Oostdyk6-2, 7-5
2021-07-17vs 7 Hermitage LinesWon 20
W#1 DoublesAbbe Voigt / Martinique Kandl vs Blakley West / Carrie Boyd5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDina Weddle vs Elizabeth Wiertel7-6, 6-3
2021-07-10vs 5 Avalon LuchsingerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartinique Kandl / Kim Martin vs Pat Donohue / Shannon Couvillion6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Dina Weddle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Martinique Kandl
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Nikki Callaghan
published
2.99
Patti Bryan
published
2.94
Larisa Lyle
published
2.79
Abbe Voigt
published 3
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.75
Jane Parrish
published
2.72
Taryn Giroux
published
2.68
Kristin Gray
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
Katy Bassler
published
Lisa Aaron
published
Peggy Bel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Blackburn + Jackie Granger224 matchesnot enough data
Abbe Voigt + Jackie Granger303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dina Weddle
148W–61L career · 1 line in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Nikki Callaghan
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Patti Bryan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
2.99
Larisa Lyle
17W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Abbe Voigt
8W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
2.79
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Jane Parrish
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.75
Taryn Giroux
16W–11L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Kristin Gray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Katy Bassler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Aaron
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Bel
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.