Teams

Wondergem/META

2025 Adult 55 & Over-META · 4.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-26vs Keith/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Mary DiSantis vs Myra O'Dell / Debbie Eskan6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnalida Alexay / Emily Caveney vs Donna Morris / Cecile Huddleston6-3, 6-3
2025-04-12vs Keith/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnalida Alexay / Alice Zhang vs Robin Dimona / Debbie Eskan6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Caveney / Jacquelyn Wondergem vs Kimberly Keith / Myra O'Dell7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeborah Louden / Mary DiSantis vs Donna Morris / Cecile Huddleston6-2, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Keith/METAWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary DiSantis / Patricia Rowland vs Erica Byrd / Robin Dimona6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAnnette Clemons / Analida Alexay vs Myra O'Dell / Cecile Huddleston6-4, 6-2
2025-03-26vs Keith/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeborah Louden / Emily Caveney vs Myra O'Dell / Debbie Eskan6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary DiSantis / Patricia Rowland vs Donna Morris / Robin Dimona6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJacquelyn Wondergem / Analida Alexay vs Kimberly Keith / Cecile Huddleston6-1, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Keith/METAWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Caveney / Lynn Johnson vs Kimberly Keith / Erica Byrd6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary DiSantis / Annette Clemons vs Donna Morris / Debbie Eskan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Louden / Patricia Rowland vs Myra O'Dell / Cecile Huddleston6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Caveney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Deborah Louden
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Mary DiSantis
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.72
Jacquelyn Wondergem
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Alice Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Analida Alexay
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.54
Annette Clemons
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Patricia Rowland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary DiSantis + Emily Caveney6159% gamesnot enough data
Alice Zhang + Analida Alexay224 matchesnot enough data
Jacquelyn Wondergem + Analida Alexay314 matchesnot enough data
Mary DiSantis + Annette Clemons303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Caveney
21W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Deborah Louden
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary DiSantis
29W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jacquelyn Wondergem
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Alice Zhang
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Analida Alexay
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Annette Clemons
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
Patricia Rowland
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.