Teams

RCW - Lady Penguins (Mac)

2023 USTA 55 & Over League · 7.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.32 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-07-26vs Hershey Hot Shots - (Danko)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJamie Hackman / Linda Scott vs Maria Salinger / Meg Rogers6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Holder / Bonnie Weaver vs Lisa Torchia / Diane Eshelman5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Elaine Rostolsky vs Lori Bernard / Brenda Peffley6-1, 6-2
2023-07-13vs Hempfield-Spin4Gin (Borza)Won 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Scott / Rene Battista vs Jeanette Eichenlaub / Anne Louise DeBord6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarol Blitz / Pamela J Hostetter vs Kathy Long / Diana Holbrook6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Holder / Isabel Bowen vs Debbie Wetzel / Beth Devitry6-3, 7-6
2023-06-27vs CCY - WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDale Heird / Jamie Hackman vs Jennifer Clancy / Deborah Fishel3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoanne Hess / Jacqueline Francis vs Cindy Rohrbaugh / Sharon Willow6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Weaver / Carol Blitz vs Lynn Newcomer / Lisa McCormack3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-20vs Hempfield-BrooksLost 03
L#1 DoublesRene Battista / Amber Kroh vs Tammy Miller / Lori Weaver4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Hess / Jamie Hackman vs Kelly Trach / Alexandra Short4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Pamela J Hostetter vs Madonna Hufnagel / Kathy Steed0-6, 1-6
2023-06-13vs Hanover -KolmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesRene Battista / Dale Heird vs Ann Lady / Deborah Mooradian6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmber Kroh / Linda Witmer vs Karen Bream / Carolyn Cockey7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPamela J Hostetter / Duffy Johnson vs Kathryn Precopio / Elizabeth Carson6-0, 6-1
2023-06-05vs Carlisle-TileyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDale Heird / Elaine Rostolsky vs Anna Jacobs / Kateri Martin6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIsabel Bowen / Bonnie Weaver vs Dara Kluger / Susan Ruch2-6, 3-6
2023-05-30vs Hempfield-DimmSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Isabel Bowen vs Bonnie Nolt / Ingrid Ziedonis0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Scott / Linda Witmer vs Gretchen Walden / Trisha Pearson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-17vs Hanover - Second Wind (Greenholt)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Scott / Rene Battista vs Diane Greenholt / Chelli McGlaughlin2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDuffy Johnson / Carol Blitz vs Amy Pomraning / Eva Hess Phillips6-7, 3-6
2023-05-09vs West Shore - DunlapWon 21
W#1 DoublesRene Battista / Linda Scott vs Susan Fridirici / Vivian Jugan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJamie Hackman / Joanne Hess vs Linda Donnelly / Regina Walsh6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrea Holder / Duffy Johnson vs Lois Jernigan / Charlene Fulponi4-6, 3-6
2023-05-02vs Hempfield - SchlageterLost 12
L#1 DoublesDale Heird / Elaine Rostolsky vs Catherine Shaak / Dorothy Stubblebine3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Kroh / Jacqueline Francis vs Amanda Caporaletti / Sandra Callanan1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPamela J Hostetter / Carol Blitz vs Teresa Clark / Kathryn Trapp6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hempfield-Brooks01022822240
2Hanover - Second Wind (Greenholt)010191129258
3West Shore - Dunlap010181229262
4Hempfield-Dimm010151533259
5Hershey Hot Shots - (Danko)010131737277
6RCW - Lady Penguins (Mac)010131739281
7CCY - Williams010141640310
8Carlisle-Tiley010121840293
9Hempfield-Spin4Gin (Borza)010111943320
10Hanover -Kolmer01082248323

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Linda Scott
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
3.52
Joanne Hess
usually #2 Doubles 70%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.49
Amber Kroh
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.37
Dale Heird
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Andrea Holder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Carol Blitz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Bonnie Weaver
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Duffy Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.01
Isabel Bowen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.90
Linda Witmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Rene Battista
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
2.85
Elaine Rostolsky
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Jamie Hackman
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Pamela J Hostetter
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sharon McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Scott + Isabel Bowen9162% games+3.3% vs expected
Linda Scott + Joanne Hess4354% games+3.2% vs expected
Dale Heird + Joanne Hess5257% games+3.1% vs expected
Dale Heird + Rene Battista8356% games+3.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Francis + Rene Battista5355% games+0.8% vs expected
Bonnie Weaver + Duffy Johnson2545% games−0.3% vs expected
Andrea Holder + Pamela J Hostetter6455% games−4.8% vs expected
Elaine Rostolsky + Rene Battista13557% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Scott
280W–166L career · 11 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Joanne Hess
152W–106L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Amber Kroh
193W–180L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Dale Heird
122W–148L career · type A · 10 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Holder
138W–150L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Carol Blitz
66W–57L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bonnie Weaver
76W–110L career · 8 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Duffy Johnson
118W–125L career · 6 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Isabel Bowen
106W–117L career · 3 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Linda Witmer
100W–76L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Rene Battista
149W–116L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Elaine Rostolsky
110W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Jamie Hackman
51W–48L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Jacqueline Francis
75W–59L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela J Hostetter
44W–38L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon McLaughlin
69W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.