Teams

UNION CITY LEISURE S/VETERANS MEM PK 18AM4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-31vs PLEASANTON 18AM4.0EWon 21
W#2 DoublesLarry Hoe / Awais Zubair vs Zachary Richard / Shi Dong6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJeff Huang vs John Chen5-0
L#3 DoublesDuke Dean / Gilbert Chang vs Sam Li / Jonathan Trinh6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-12vs PLEASANTON 18AM4.0ELost 12
L#1 SinglesJeff Huang vs John Chen2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAwais Zubair / Rommel Ad vs Sam Li / Jesse Terrel-Perez4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesArman Joachim Jiro vs Justin Nghiem6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Awais Zubair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Arman Joachim Jiro
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.75
Danny Salamida
published 4
3.74
William Du
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.74
Gino Alimario
published 4
3.72
Gilbert Chang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Larry Hoe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Duke Dean
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Vipin Gupta
published
3.48
Randy Chan
published
3.38
Michael Francisco
published
3.21
Nilo Clava
published
Jeff Huang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Arman Joachim Jiro + Awais Zubair1449% games+15.6% vs expected
Gilbert Chang + Gino Alimario6257% games+7.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Awais Zubair
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Arman Joachim Jiro
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Danny Salamida
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.75
William Du
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Gino Alimario
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Gilbert Chang
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Larry Hoe
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Duke Dean
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Vipin Gupta
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.54
Randy Chan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
3.48
Michael Francisco
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.38
Nilo Clava
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Jeff Huang
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.