Teams

RHawkins-HR

2025 Eno River Adult 65 & Over · 65 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-17vs LOakley-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Fitts / Jodi Preminger vs Dorene Palermo / Judi Seagroves2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJan ORegan / Jimi Harrison vs Laurie Oakley / Leslye Rood6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRachel Hawkins / Regina Kronmiller vs Lissa Jensen / Valerie Williams1-6, 1-6
2025-04-10vs DWebb-YMCAWon 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Hawkins / Peggy Maslow vs Jan Hagerty / Louise Tabron6-2, 6-4
2025-04-03vs HKoo-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Hanlon / Peggy Maslow vs Debra Good / Bonnie Rogers7-6, 6-3
2025-03-27vs LOakley-CHCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathleen Fitts / Regina Kronmiller vs Laurie Oakley / Leslye Rood3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRachel Hawkins / Jodi Preminger vs Carolyn Hightower / Dorene Palermo1-6, 4-6
2025-03-20vs DWebb-YMCALost 01
L#1 DoublesPeggy Maslow / Mary Hanlon vs Barbara St Clair / Terry Friddle4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-13vs HKoo-UNCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Hanlon / Jan ORegan vs Mary Blanks / Rosalind Coleman6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRegina Kronmiller / Jimi Harrison vs Debra Good / Bonnie Rogers1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathleen Fitts / Rachel Hawkins vs Bonnie Gould / Susan Berry6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kathleen Fitts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Peggy Maslow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Jan ORegan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Jodi Preminger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Mary Hanlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Jimi Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Regina Kronmiller
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.24
Rachel Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan ORegan + Rachel Hawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Regina Kronmiller + Rachel Hawkins033 matchesnot enough data
Mary Hanlon + Rachel Hawkins123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Fitts
11W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Peggy Maslow
30W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Jan ORegan
8W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jodi Preminger
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Mary Hanlon
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
43%56%<1%
2.52
Jimi Harrison
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Regina Kronmiller
4W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
Rachel Hawkins
2W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.