Teams

NNM 8.0M JC-Wiley

2022 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 8.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-19vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 02
L#1 DoublesDouglas Oltmans / Tom Knoop vs Mark Wallenbrock / Tom Weeks4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel McClanahan / Larry Schneider vs Frederick Ellis / Roy McKinney3-6, 6-7
2022-10-12vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 03
L#1 DoublesLarry Schneider / Daniel McClanahan vs Kenneth Harper / Peter Korsan3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTom Knoop / Michael Herrera vs Mark Wallenbrock / Vahl Jackson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Wiley / Douglas Oltmans vs Tom Weeks / Roy McKinney5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-09-27vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Wiley / Douglas Oltmans vs Greg Smith / Richard Barker5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Herrera / Larry Schneider vs Roy McKinney / Frederick Ellis3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Wills / Bill Szaroletta vs Tom Arnold / Daniel Stephens4-6, 4-6
2022-09-20vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Walsh / Kevin Wiley vs Mark Wallenbrock / David Harnick6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Herrera / Larry Schneider vs Richard Barker / Greg Smith7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBill Szaroletta / Richard Schaefer vs Tom Weeks / Frederick Ellis1-6, 2-6
2022-09-14vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin Wiley / Douglas Oltmans vs Kenneth Harper / Vahl Jackson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTom Knoop / Richard Schaefer vs Mark Wallenbrock / Tom Weeks0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Schneider / Daniel McClanahan vs Tom Arnold / Frederick Ellis6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-07vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Felice / Daniel McClanahan vs Kenneth Harper / Tom Weeks3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Oltmans / Kevin Wiley vs Frederick Ellis / Roy McKinney6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTerry Cleveland / Bill Szaroletta vs Mark Wallenbrock / Ty Martello1-6, 3-6
2022-08-30vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Oltmans / John Wills vs David Harnick / Frederick Ellis4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTom Knoop / Michael Herrera vs Tom Arnold / Tim Sander5-7, 4-0
L#3 DoublesRichard Schaefer / Larry Schneider vs Richard Barker / Daniel Stephens2-6, 4-6
2022-08-23vs NNM 8.0M - WallenbrockLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Cleveland / Andrew MacIas vs Tom Arnold / David Harnick3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTom Knoop / Michael Herrera vs Tom Weeks / Mark Wallenbrock4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Wills / Douglas Oltmans vs Greg Smith / Richard Barker4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
John Wills
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
David Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Douglas Oltmans
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.63
Bruce Burnham
published 4
3.42
Daniel McClanahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.42
Kevin Wiley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Michael Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Joseph Felice
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Terry Cleveland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Bill Szaroletta
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Larry Schneider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Richard Schaefer
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Herrera + Terry Cleveland5647% games+1.4% vs expected
Douglas Oltmans + Kevin Wiley7752% games−8.8% vs expected
Daniel McClanahan + Larry Schneider1450% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Felice + Terry Cleveland033 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Oltmans + Bruce Burnham033 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Burnham + Daniel McClanahan033 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Burnham + David Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Wills
36W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
David Walsh
13W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Douglas Oltmans
49W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Bruce Burnham
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Daniel McClanahan
78W–105L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
Kevin Wiley
35W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Michael Herrera
74W–98L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Joseph Felice
95W–86L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Terry Cleveland
86W–119L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Bill Szaroletta
9W–14L career · type S · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Schneider
8W–22L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Schaefer
6W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.