Teams

KY/PUR/JONES

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER PURCHASE · 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-22vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 03
L#1 DoublesKellie Steele / Ashley Willis vs Susan Sullivan / KerriBeth Sutla1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda VanCura vs Jennifer Price1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesGaby Acree vs Mallory Harris3-6, 0-6
2025-05-22vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Jones / Gaby Acree vs Marta Elliott / KRISTA Hatchett0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Kineman vs Susan Sullivan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLiz Stevenson / Ashley Thurmond vs Jennifer Price / Teela Venice0-6, 1-6
2025-05-05vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda VanCura / Gaby Acree vs Jennifer Price / KRISTA Hatchett1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKeila Shultz / Pam Jones vs Mallory Harris / Alexis Rouse4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAshley Thurmond / Kellie Steele vs Chelsea Hartmann / Marta Elliott1-6, 0-6
2025-04-30vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 12
L#1 DoublesKellie Steele / Gaby Acree vs Susan Sullivan / Teela Venice3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLiz Stevenson vs Heidi van Ameringen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPam Jones / Dorian Chambers vs KRISTA Hatchett / Jennifer Price0-6, 1-6
2025-04-14vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Almand / Karen Kineman vs Teela Venice / Mallory Harris1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Cates / Ashley Willis vs Alexis Rouse / Kara Geiger4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPam Jones vs Heidi van Ameringen1-6, 0-6
2025-04-01vs KY/PUR/VENICELost 03
L#1 DoublesPam Jones / Ashley Willis vs KRISTA Hatchett / Mallory Harris1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Kineman / Donna Almand vs Kara Geiger / Heidi van Ameringen1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLiz Stevenson / Kellie Steele vs KerriBeth Sutla / Teela Venice1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Keila Shultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Judy Cates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Theresa Lundberg
published
3.12
Karen Kineman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Donna Almand
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Gaby Acree
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.75
Kellie Steele
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ashley Thurmond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Amanda VanCura
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Pam Jones
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.71
Dorian Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Liz Stevenson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Almand + Karen Kineman3643% games+0.9% vs expected
Gaby Acree + Kellie Steele1541% gamesnot enough data
Dorian Chambers + Pam Jones033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keila Shultz
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Judy Cates
19W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Theresa Lundberg
18W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Karen Kineman
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Donna Almand
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.06
Gaby Acree
14W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Kellie Steele
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Ashley Thurmond
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Amanda VanCura
15W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Pam Jones
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
Dorian Chambers
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Liz Stevenson
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.