Teams

KF.Evans

2022 CTRL Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-07vs KF.JohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesRon Jeffery / Legare Woods vs Jeff Brown / Virginia Lewis1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Evans / Olga Tiselsky vs Howard Lem / Marlene Fricano6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKip Sturgis / Hanna Sturgis vs William Pencola / Alice Schoots3-6, 6-7
2022-07-17vs KF.JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesRandy Lakey / Hanna Sturgis vs Ronald Radloff / MaryLu Radloff4-6, 3-6
2022-07-16vs KF.JohnsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesKip Sturgis / Hanna Sturgis vs Scott Hoffman / Virginia Lewis2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRon Jeffery / Legare Woods vs Ronald Radloff / MaryLu Radloff2-6, 5-7
2022-06-26vs KF.JohnsonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRandy Lakey / Hanna Sturgis vs Howard Lem / Marlene Fricano6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Evans / Karon Mertens vs Roy Johnson / Karen Conners1-6, 4-6
2022-06-19vs KF.JohnsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJames Wojcio / Olga Tiselsky vs Howard Lem / Virginia Lewis1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRon Jeffery / Lisa Carley vs William Pencola / Alice Schoots1-6, 2-6
2022-06-05vs KF.JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Evans / Karon Mertens vs Randy Myers / Julie Tapp6-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Sardinha
published 3.5
3.21
Ron Jeffery
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
James Wojcio
published 3.5
3.19
Olga Tiselsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Legare Woods
published
3.16
Lisa Carley
published
3.09
Karon Mertens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Hanna Sturgis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
James Hardison
published 3
Kip Sturgis
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Sardinha
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ron Jeffery
37W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
James Wojcio
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Olga Tiselsky
129W–135L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Legare Woods
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Lisa Carley
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Karon Mertens
122W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
3.09
3
Hanna Sturgis
82W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
James Hardison
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
Kip Sturgis
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.