Teams

WP GREEN

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT

6 players · average NTRP 4.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-31Won 10
W#1 SinglesArmando Escalante vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-28vs CACM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs Brian Frederick / Miles Doane1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesArmando Escalante vs Sameer Mehta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-08-24vs CP REDLost 12
W#1 DoublesClint Jones / Matthew Hooper vs MATTHEW BLAIR / James Elsworth4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAndy Kim vs Mickey Plotkin2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesArmando Escalante / Christopher Richardson vs Adam Abraham / John Greves4-6, 4-6
2021-08-10vs SKY GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Hooper / Clint Jones vs David Eckelberger / Ryan Richards6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCharles Philp vs Chauncey Staples4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Kim / Christopher Richardson vs James Mejia / Lance Wells3-6, 4-6
2021-08-03vs CP REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesAndy Kim / Armando Escalante vs Mickey Plotkin / Robert Wilson4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Hooper vs Blair Watkins3-6, 4-6
2021-07-27vs CACM REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndy Kim / Matthew Hooper vs Sameer Mehta / Brian Frederick2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesClint Jones vs Ben Atlee6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Philp / Russell Bennett vs Miles Doane / Dan Murphy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Matthew Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Charles Philp
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.11
Clint Jones
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.86
Armando Escalante
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.77
Andy Kim
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Russell Bennett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Hooper + Clint Jones17756% games+5.3% vs expected
Clint Jones + Andy Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Russell Bennett + Andy Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Hooper
88W–36L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Charles Philp
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Clint Jones
41W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Armando Escalante
14W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.86
4
Andy Kim
12W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Russell Bennett
7W–22L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.