Teams

CCR 2

Rochester Women's Interclub League · Division II

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-14vs TCR: Gladstone-BrownWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesGrace Williams / Beth Siebert vs Kathleen Wilmot / Jane Mulvehill6-1, 6-1
W#2 Female DoublesSarah Kaduc / Alissa Roger vs Roseann McGee / Renee Ortiz6-0, 6-2
2026-08-10vs Oak Hill: Rivers/JohnsonWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesGrace Williams / Beth Siebert vs Sara Ressler / Rita Kladstrup6-4, 6-0
W#2 Female DoublesSusan Burt / Stephanie Corey vs Mary Ann Torchio / Sarah Pickhardt6-4, 6-3
2026-07-31vs MidtownLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesTaylor Veenema / Beth Siebert vs Abigail Runner / Mandy Newell6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesStephanie Corey / Heather Ralph vs Joanne Parkes / Susan Weinberg1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-10vs Monroe: BravemanWon 30
W#1 Female DoublesGrace Williams / Sarah Kaduc vs Laura Rocca / Kimberly Cufari Chin6-2, 6-2
W#2 Female DoublesHeather Ralph / Beth Siebert vs Juliana Sass / Maria Mauntel6-3, 7-6
W#3 Female DoublesAlissa Roger / PK Morley vs Lauren Elker / Rachel Aquino6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-26vs GVC: FullerWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesLauren Henderson / Sarah Kaduc vs Claire Stoner / Joan O'Byrne3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-19vs CCR 1Won 20
W#2 Female DoublesLauren Kaduc / Sarah Kaduc vs Laurin Derrick / Jackie Fox6-3, 6-2
W#3 Female DoublesHolly Geary / Alexandra Winner vs Shannon Cunniffe / Rebecca Webster6-3, 6-1
2026-06-12vs Oak Hill: Rivers/JohnsonWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesTaylor Veenema / Lauren Henderson vs Carli Rivers / Sara Ressler6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesBeth Siebert / Heather Ralph vs Nicole Pereira / Caroline Duffy6-3, 6-2
2026-06-05vs MidtownLost 02
L#1 Female DoublesSusan Burt / Alissa Roger vs Abigail Runner / Mandy Newell2-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesHeather Ralph / Lauren Kaduc vs Paula Newlands / Emilie Drumm4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Division II have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Taylor Veenema
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Beth Siebert
usually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Lauren Henderson
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Alissa Roger
usually #1 Female Doubles 33%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Stephanie Corey
published
2.88
Holly Geary
usually #3 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
Alexandra Winner
published 3
2.63
Jennifer Anthony
published
Heather Ralph
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Geary
published
Lauren Kaduc
usually #2 Female Doubles 100% · published
PK Morley
published
Sarah Kaduc
usually #2 Female Doubles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published
Susan Burt
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alissa Roger + Lauren Henderson7255% gamesnot enough data
Holly Geary + Lauren Kaduc6171% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Kaduc + Sarah Kaduc2355% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Henderson + Taylor Veenema404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Veenema
61W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Beth Siebert
10W–23L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lauren Henderson
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Alissa Roger
38W–17L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Stephanie Corey
5W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.10
3
Holly Geary
65W–47L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Alexandra Winner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Anthony
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
2.63
Heather Ralph
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Geary
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lauren Kaduc
20W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
PK Morley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Kaduc
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Burt
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.