Teams

GR-Worthington 55s 3.5W SP

2025 Neuse River Adult 55 & Over League · 3.5 Women 55 & over

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesWhitney Musgrave / Darlene Worthington vs Missy Taylor / Martha Martin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTerry Ray / Pam Taylor vs Kathleen Diamadi / Debbie Hunter6-0, 6-3
2025-04-12vs Emerald-Smith/Pons 55s 3.5 W SPWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaige Temple / Leone Gravelin vs Susan Moore / Lisa Zurawski6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPam Taylor / Darlene Worthington vs Diane McKeel / Luann Scruggs6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTerry Ray / Lisa Thigpen vs Nicole Carlyle / Lori Wagner6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeone Gravelin / Paige Temple vs Julie Randle / Bridget Cella6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKarla Jennings / Terry Ray vs Kathleen Diamadi / Nicole Hart2-3
2025-03-15vs WCC-Bridgers 55s 3.5W SPWon 30
W#1 DoublesWhitney Musgrave / Leone Gravelin vs Jane Boswell / Georgia Thomas4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDarlene Worthington / Pam Taylor vs Sherrie Bridgers / Mary Lou Skinner6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerry Ray / Lisa Thigpen vs Jude Holbrook / Anna Appert7-5, 6-1
2025-03-08vs Emerald-Smith/Pons 55s 3.5 W SPWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Johnson / Whitney Musgrave vs Lisa Zurawski / Diane McKeel6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDarlene Worthington / Leone Gravelin vs Terry Shoup / Luann Scruggs6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Ray / Pam Taylor vs Rachel Smith / Ann Game6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 55 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Terry Ray
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Darlene Worthington
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.03
Whitney Musgrave
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Paige Temple
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Lisa Thigpen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Karla Jennings
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leone Gravelin
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Whitney Musgrave + Paige Temple4152% games+3.1% vs expected
Darlene Worthington + Leone Gravelin314 matchesnot enough data
Darlene Worthington + Paige Temple044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Thigpen + Paige Temple213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terry Ray
22W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Darlene Worthington
23W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Whitney Musgrave
40W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Paige Temple
26W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Lisa Thigpen
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Karla Jennings
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
0%16%84%
2.64
Leone Gravelin
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.